"nos", "já", "eu", "também", "só", "pelo", "pela", "até", "isso", "ela", "entre", "depois", "sem", "mesmo", "aos", "seus", "quem", "nas", "me", "esse", "eles", "você", "essa", "num", "nem", "suas", "meu", "às", "minha", "numa", "pelos", "elas", "qual", "nós", "lhe", "deles", "essas", "esses", "pelas", "este", "dele", "tu", "te", "vocês", "vos", "lhes", "meus", "minhas", "teu", "tua", "teus", "tuas", "nosso", "nossa", "nossos", "nossas", "dela", "delas", "esta", "estes", "estas", "aquele", "aquela", "aqueles",...

   * {@code SerializableTester} calls with other, GWT-compatible tests.
   *
   * <p>Note that the specified object may not be known by the compiler to be a {@link
   * java.io.Serializable} instance, and is thus declared an {@code Object}. For example, it might
   * be declared as a {@code List}.
   *
   * @return the re-serialized object
   * @throws RuntimeException if the specified object was not successfully serialized or

   * to get rid of, and {@code @NonNull} would be wrong for our use case for the same reason as
   * {@code requireNonNull}: Our use case is the one in which {@code T} has parametric nullness—and
   * thus its value may be legitimately {@code null}.)
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("nullness")
  @ParametricNullness
  static <T extends @Nullable Object> T uncheckedCastNullableTToT(@Nullable T t) {
    return t;
  }

  /**

import okhttp3.FallbackTestClientSocketFactory.Companion.TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV

/**
 * An SSLSocketFactory that delegates calls. Sockets created by the delegate are wrapped with ones
 * that will not accept the [TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV] cipher, thus bypassing server-side fallback
 * checks on platforms that support it. Unfortunately this wrapping will disable any
 * reflection-based calls to SSLSocket from Platform.
 */
class FallbackTestClientSocketFactory(

package com.google.common.eventbus;

import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkNotNull;

import com.google.common.base.MoreObjects;

/**
 * Wraps an event that was posted, but which had no subscribers and thus could not be delivered.
 *
 * <p>Registering a DeadEvent subscriber is useful for debugging or logging, as it can detect
 * misconfigurations in a system's event distribution.
 *
 * @author Cliff Biffle
 * @since 10.0

  }

  @CollectionSize.Require(SEVERAL)
  @MapFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE)
  /*
   * SetMultimap.asMap essentially returns a Map<K, Set<V>>; we just can't declare it that way.
   * Thus, calls like asMap().values().remove(someSet) are safe because they are comparing a set to
   * a collection of other sets.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("CollectionUndefinedEquality")
  public void testValuesRemove() {

 * Collections of strategies of generating the k * log(M) bits required for an element to be mapped
 * to a BloomFilter of M bits and k hash functions. These strategies are part of the serialized form
 * of the Bloom filters that use them, thus they must be preserved as is (no updates allowed, only
 * introduction of new versions).
 *
 * <p>Important: the order of the constants cannot change, and they cannot be deleted - we depend on

   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getAddNullSupportedMethod() {

   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getAddNullSupportedMethod() {

   * The version of this test supplied by {@link MapInterfaceTest} fails for this particular Map
   * implementation, because {@code map.get()} returns a view collection that changes in the course
   * of a call to {@code remove()}. Thus, the expectation doesn't hold that {@code map.remove(x)}
   * returns the same value which {@code map.get(x)} did immediately beforehand.
   */
  @Override
  public void testRemove() {
    Map<String, Collection<Integer>> map;