}

        private static String buildDisabledRepositoryErrorMessage(String repositoryName) {
            return String.format("Repository %s is disabled due to earlier error below:", repositoryName);
        }

        private <E extends Throwable, R extends ErroringResolveResult<E>> void performOperationWithRetries(R result,

    if (!Collections.disjoint(newFeatures, earlierFeatures)) {
      throw new ConflictingRequirementsException(
          String.format(
              Locale.ROOT,
              "Annotation requires to be %s features that earlier "
                  + "annotations required to be %s.",
              newRequirement,
              earlierRequirement),
          intersection(newFeatures, earlierFeatures),
          source);
    }
  }

            // TODO: This is very suspicious. We should always fail here.
            // `strict` was added because file dependencies' components are never included in the graph.
            // We should detect this earlier and return no dependencies there to avoid `strict`.
            if (strict) {
                throw new AssertionError("Could not find component " + componentIdentifier + " in provided results.");
            } else {

            return hashBytes(input.toString().getBytes(charset));
          }
          i++;
          buffer |= codePointToFourUtf8Bytes(codePoint) << shift;
          if (supplementaryPlaneFix) { // bug compatibility: earlier versions did not have this add
            shift += 32;
          }
          len += 4;
        }

        if (shift >= 32) {
          int k1 = mixK1((int) buffer);
          h1 = mixH1(h1, k1);

  //    finally { guard.unlock(); }
  // Here are Justin's design notes about this:
  //
  // This idea has come up from time to time, and I think one of my
  // earlier versions of Monitor even did something like this. I ended
  // up strongly favoring the current interface.
  //
  // I probably can't remember all the reasons (it's possible you

   *
   * <p>When the underlying delegate throws an exception then this memoizing supplier will keep
   * delegating calls until it returns valid data.
   *
   * <p>If {@code delegate} is an instance created by an earlier call to {@code memoize}, it is
   * returned directly.
   */
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object> Supplier<T> memoize(Supplier<T> delegate) {
    if (delegate instanceof NonSerializableMemoizingSupplier

 * assertEquals(TypeToken.of(String.class), invokable.getReturnType()); // Not Object.class!
 * assertEquals(new TypeToken<List<String>>() {}, invokable.getOwnerType());
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <p><b>Note:</b> earlier versions of this class inherited from {@link
 * java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject AccessibleObject} and {@link
 * java.lang.reflect.GenericDeclaration GenericDeclaration}. Since version 31.0 that is no longer

   * so that we get partial compile-time checking.)
   *
   * <p>This workaround should be removed at a distant future time when we no longer support Java
   * versions earlier than 8.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("removal") // b/318391980
  private static final class TypeVariableInvocationHandler implements InvocationHandler {
    private static final ImmutableMap<String, Method> typeVariableMethods;

      barrier.await(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
      executor.execute(barrierTask);
      // timeout means the second task wasn't even tried
      barrier.await(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
    } finally {
      service.shutdown();
    }
  }

  public void testRejectedExecutionThrownWithMultipleCalls() throws Exception {
    final CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(1);

@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public final class Lists {
  private Lists() {}

  // ArrayList

  /**
   * Creates a <i>mutable</i>, empty {@code ArrayList} instance (for Java 6 and earlier).
   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> if mutability is not required, use {@link ImmutableList#of()} instead.
   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> this method is now unnecessary and should be treated as deprecated. Instead,