with subsection 6b.

    d) Convey the object code by offering access from a designated
    place (gratis or for a charge), and offer equivalent access to the
    Corresponding Source in the same way through the same place at no
    further charge.  You need not require recipients to copy the
    Corresponding Source along with the object code.  If the place to
    copy the object code is a network server, the Corresponding Source

        }
    }

    public void test_throwAndCatchWithCause() {
        // Test throwing and catching the exception with cause
        String expectedMessage = "SAML assertion validation failed";
        Exception expectedCause = new IllegalStateException("Invalid SAML response");

        try {
            throw new SsoProcessException(expectedMessage, expectedCause);
        } catch (SsoProcessException e) {

	resp := lockRPCForceUnlock.NewResponse()

	_, err := l.ll.ForceUnlock(context.Background(), *args)
	return l.makeResp(resp, err)
}

var (
	// Static lock handlers.
	// All have the same signature.
	lockRPCForceUnlock = newLockHandler(grid.HandlerLockForceUnlock)
	lockRPCRefresh     = newLockHandler(grid.HandlerLockRefresh)
	lockRPCLock        = newLockHandler(grid.HandlerLockLock)

	echo "Remove the contents of the disks belonging to '${1}' erasure set"

	rm -rf ${WORK_DIR}/${1}/*/

	set -x
	start_minio_3_node $2
}

function main() {
	# use same ports for all tests
	start_port=$(shuf -i 10000-65000 -n 1)

	perform_test "2" ${start_port}
	perform_test "1" ${start_port}
	perform_test "3" ${start_port}
}

(__init__ "$@" && main "$@")
rv=$?

 *       lock.unlock();
 *     }
 *   }
 * }
 * }
 *
 * <h3>{@code Monitor}</h3>
 *
 * <p>This version adds some verbosity around the {@code Guard} objects, but removes that same
 * verbosity, and more, from the {@code get} and {@code set} methods. {@code Monitor} implements the
 * same efficient signaling as we had to hand-code in the {@code ReentrantLock} version above.

1. Start a distributed MinIO instance (4 nodes setup)
2. Start Prometheus server and AlertManager
3. Bring down couple of MinIO instances to bring down the Erasure Set tolerance to -1 and verify the same with `mc admin prometheus metrics ALIAS | grep minio_cluster_health_erasure_set_status`

    assertNull(Callables.returning(null).call());

    Object value = new Object();
    Callable<Object> callable = Callables.returning(value);
    assertSame(value, callable.call());
    // Expect the same value on subsequent calls
    assertSame(value, callable.call());
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible
  public void testAsAsyncCallable() throws Exception {
    String expected = "MyCallableString";

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public class ListEqualsTester<E> extends AbstractListTester<E> {
  public void testEquals_otherListWithSameElements() {
    assertTrue(
        "A List should equal any other List containing the same elements.",
        getList().equals(new ArrayList<E>(getOrderedElements())));
  }

  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = CollectionSize.ZERO)
  public void testEquals_otherListWithDifferentElements() {

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},