checkInvalidRange("[1.0,1.0)");
        checkInvalidRange("(1.0,1.0)");
        checkInvalidRange("[1.1,1.0]");
        checkInvalidRange("[1.0,1.2),1.3");
        // overlap
        checkInvalidRange("[1.0,1.2),(1.1,1.3]");
        // overlap
        checkInvalidRange("[1.1,1.3),(1.0,1.2]");
        // ordering
        checkInvalidRange("(1.1,1.2],[1.0,1.1)");
    }

    @Test

 *
 * Mappings Data (4,719 bytes)
 * ===========================
 *
 * This is UTF-8 character data. It is indexed into by b2b3 in the ranges dataset.
 *
 * Mappings may overlap.
 *
 * ASCII-Only
 * ==========
 *
 * Neither the section index nor the ranges data use bit 0x80 anywhere. That means the data is

            assertEquals(0x0002, Smb2Constants.SMB2_NEGOTIATE_SIGNING_REQUIRED, "Signing required flag must be 0x0002");
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Signing flags should not overlap")
        void testSigningFlagsNoOverlap() {
            assertNotEquals(Smb2Constants.SMB2_NEGOTIATE_SIGNING_ENABLED, Smb2Constants.SMB2_NEGOTIATE_SIGNING_REQUIRED,
                    "Signing flags must be distinct");

	}

	if cap(t.requestsPool) != apiRequestsMaxPerNode {
		// Only replace if needed.
		// Existing requests will use the previous limit,
		// but new requests will use the new limit.
		// There will be a short overlap window,
		// but this shouldn't last long.
		t.requestsPool = make(chan struct{}, apiRequestsMaxPerNode)
	}
	listQuorum := cfg.ListQuorum
	if listQuorum == "" {
		listQuorum = "strict"
	}

        assertEquals(2, resolvedFirst.length);
        assertEquals("user1", ((SID) resolvedFirst[0]).acctName);
        assertEquals("user2", ((SID) resolvedFirst[1]).acctName);

        // Second call with overlap should use cache for s2 and s3, requiring only s3 if not cached
        // Mark s3 unresolved to force resolve of one element
        doAnswer(inv -> {
            SID[] toResolve = inv.getArgument(2);

    assertLockHeld()

    // If this connection is not accepting new exchanges, we're done.
    if (calls.size >= allocationLimit || noNewExchanges) return false

    // If the non-host fields of the address don't overlap, we're done.
    if (!this.route.address.equalsNonHost(address)) return false

    // If the host exactly matches, we're done: this connection can carry the address.
    if (address.url.host ==
      this

     * Wrapper<Number>, Wrapper<Integer>, Wrapper<@Nullable Integer>, etc. If we used just
     * Equivalence<? super T> below, no type could satisfy both that bound and T's own
     * bound. With this type, they have some overlap: in our example, Equivalence<Number>
     * and Equivalence<Object>.
     */
    private final Equivalence<? super @NonNull T> equivalence;

    @ParametricNullness private final T reference;

// The copy built-in function copies elements from a source slice into a
// destination slice. (As a special case, it also will copy bytes from a
// string to a slice of bytes.) The source and destination may overlap. Copy
// returns the number of elements copied, which will be the minimum of
// len(src) and len(dst).
func copy(dst, src []Type) int

// The delete built-in function deletes the element with the specified key

          }
        } else {
          Set<? extends Entry<? extends E>> entries = multiset.entrySet();
          contents.ensureCapacity(Math.max(contents.size(), entries.size())); // might overlap
          for (Entry<? extends E> entry : multiset.entrySet()) {
            addCopies(entry.getElement(), entry.getCount());
          }
        }
      } else {
        super.addAll(elements);
      }

    /*
     * For an explanation of the basic principle behind this check, see
     * https://stackoverflow.com/a/35754308/28465
     *
     * In that explanation's notation, our `overlap` check would be `x1 < y2 && y1 < x2`. We've
     * flipped one part of the check so that we're using "less than" in both cases (rather than a