slowFactorials[i] = RANDOM_SOURCE.nextInt(factorialBound);
      binomials[i] = RANDOM_SOURCE.nextInt(factorials[i] + 1);
    }
  }

  /** Previous version of BigIntegerMath.factorial, kept for timing purposes. */
  private static BigInteger oldSlowFactorial(int n) {
    if (n <= 20) {
      return BigInteger.valueOf(LongMath.factorial(n));
    } else {
      int k = 20;

  public static final String SERVER = "Server";
  /**
   * The HTTP <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/server-timing/">{@code Server-Timing}</a> header field
   * name.
   *
   * @since 23.6
   */
  public static final String SERVER_TIMING = "Server-Timing";
  /**
   * The HTTP <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/service-workers/#update-algorithm">{@code
   * Service-Worker-Allowed}</a> header field name.

            activeThreads--
            startNextTask()
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * This blocking queue hooks into a fake clock rather than using regular JVM timing for functions
   * like [poll]. It is only usable within task faker tasks.
   */
  private inner class TaskFakerBlockingQueue<T>(
    val delegate: BlockingQueue<T>,
  ) : AbstractQueue<T>(), BlockingQueue<T> {

// Events have a limited retention time and triggers and messages may evolve
// with time.  Event consumers should not rely on the timing of an event
// with a given Reason reflecting a consistent underlying trigger, or the
// continued existence of events with that Reason.  Events should be
// treated as informative, best-effort, supplemental data.
message Event {

        Assume.assumeTrue(getContext().getConfig().getResolveOrder().contains(ResolverType.RESOLVER_DNS));
        long start = System.currentTimeMillis() / 1000 * 1000;
        // this is not too great as it depends on timing/clockskew
        // first we need to obtain a ticket, therefor need valid credentials
        // then we need to wait until the ticket is expired
        int wait = 10 * 1000;
        long princExp = start + ( wait / 2 );

// Events have a limited retention time and triggers and messages may evolve
// with time.  Event consumers should not rely on the timing of an event
// with a given Reason reflecting a consistent underlying trigger, or the
// continued existence of events with that Reason.  Events should be
// treated as informative, best-effort, supplemental data.
message Event {

          try {
            if (timer != null) {
              long overDelayMs = Math.abs(timer.getDelay(MILLISECONDS));
              if (overDelayMs > 10) { // Not all timing drift is worth reporting
                message += " (timeout delayed by " + overDelayMs + " ms after scheduled time)";
              }
            }
            message += ": " + delegate;
          } finally {

	})
}

func (f *sftpDriver) AccessKey() string {
	return f.permissions.CriticalOptions["AccessKey"]
}

func (f *sftpDriver) Fileread(r *sftp.Request) (ra io.ReaderAt, err error) {
	// This is not timing the actual read operation, but the time it takes to prepare the reader.
	stopFn := globalSftpMetrics.log(r, f.AccessKey())
	defer stopFn(0, err)

	flags := r.Pflags()
	if !flags.Read {
		// sanity check

                .build();

        /*
        // This is the desired behaviour, however there are too many crappy poms in the repo and an issue with the
        // timing of executing the interpolation

        try
        {
        new RegexBasedModelInterpolator().interpolate( model, context );
        fail( "Should have failed to interpolate with invalid reference" );
        }

   * representation to this hash code.
   *
   * <p><b>Security note:</b> this method uses a constant-time (not short-circuiting) implementation
   * to protect against <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timing_attack">timing attacks</a>.
   */
  @Override
  public final boolean equals(@CheckForNull Object object) {
    if (object instanceof HashCode) {
      HashCode that = (HashCode) object;