HeldCertificate.Builder()
        .serialNumber(1L)
        .certificateAuthority(4)
        .commonName("attacker ca")
        .build()
    val attackerIntermediate =
      HeldCertificate.Builder()
        .serialNumber(2L)
        .certificateAuthority(3)
        .commonName("attacker")
        .signedBy(attackerCa)
        .build()
    val pinnedRoot =
      HeldCertificate.Builder()

mitigate the risk in this scenario is to sandbox the model execution.

### Hardware attacks

Physical GPUs or TPUs can also be the target of attacks. [Published
research](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=gpu+side+channel) shows that it
might be possible to use side channel attacks on the GPU to leak data from other
running models or processes in the same system. GPUs can also have

        br.addItem("Advice");
        br.addElement("Against for JVN14876762.");
        br.addElement("Boundary size is limited by Framework.");
        br.addElement("Too long boundary is treated as 404 because it's thought of as attack.");
        br.addElement("");
        br.addElement("While, you can override the boundary limit size");
        br.addElement(" in " + FessMultipartRequestHandler.class.getSimpleName() + ".");

    # Return some error
    ...
```

But by using the `secrets.compare_digest()` it will be secure against a type of attacks called "timing attacks".

### Timing Attacks

But what's a "timing attack"?

Let's imagine some attackers are trying to guess the username and password.

And they send a request with a username `johndoe` and a password `love123`.

By default, OkHttp trusts the certificate authorities of the host platform. This strategy maximizes connectivity, but it is subject to certificate authority attacks such as the [2011 DigiNotar attack](https://www.computerworld.com/article/2510951/cybercrime-hacking/hackers-spied-on-300-000-iranians-using-fake-google-certificate.html). It also assumes your HTTPS servers’ certificates are signed by a certificate authority.

   * representation to this hash code.
   *
   * <p><b>Security note:</b> this method uses a constant-time (not short-circuiting) implementation
   * to protect against <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timing_attack">timing attacks</a>.
   */
  @Override
  public final boolean equals(@CheckForNull Object object) {
    if (object instanceof HashCode) {
      HashCode that = (HashCode) object;

#### Secure Erasure and Locking

The MinIO server requires an available KMS to en/decrypt SSE-S3 encrypted objects. Therefore it is possible to erase or lock some or all encrypted objects. For example in case of a detected attack or other emergency situations the following actions can be taken:

        .addEqualityGroup(ImmutableSet.of(1, 2, 1), ImmutableSet.of(2, 1, 1))
        .testEquals();
  }

  /**
   * The maximum allowed probability of falsely detecting a hash flooding attack if the input is
   * randomly generated.
   */
  private static final double HASH_FLOODING_FPP = 0.001;

  public void testReuseBuilderReducingHashTableSizeWithPowerOfTwoTotalElements() {

  @VisibleForTesting @CheckForNull transient @Nullable Object[] elements;

  /**
   * Keeps track of metadata like the number of hash table bits and modifications of this data
   * structure (to make it possible to throw ConcurrentModificationException in the iterator). Note
   * that we choose not to make this volatile, so we do less of a "best effort" to track such
   * errors, for better performance.
   */
  private transient int metadata;

 *
 * ```java
 * String attack = "http://example.com/static/images/../../../../../etc/passwd";
 * System.out.println(new URL(attack).getPath());
 * System.out.println(new URI(attack).getPath());
 * System.out.println(HttpUrl.parse(attack).encodedPath());
 * ```
 *
 * By canonicalizing the input paths, they are complicit in directory traversal attacks. Code that
 * checks only the path prefix may suffer!
 *