* code, running tests, packaging the project, and deploying it. Executing a phase
 * triggers all preceding phases, ensuring that each step of the build process is
 * completed in the correct order. The three main lifecycles in Maven are
 * {@link #DEFAULT default}, {@link #CLEAN clean}, and {@link #SITE site}, with the
 * {@code default} lifecycle being the most commonly used for project builds.
 *

	s.Set(key, cacheStmt)
	// Unlock after completing initialization to prevent deadlocks.
	locker.Unlock()

	// Ensure the prepared channel is closed after the function execution completes.
	defer close(cacheStmt.prepared)

	// Prepare the SQL statement using the provided connection.
	cacheStmt.Stmt, err = conn.PrepareContext(ctx, key)
	if err != nil {

Ces outils nécessitent généralement des configurations plus complexes ainsi qu'un gestionnaire de queue de message, comme RabbitMQ ou Redis, mais ils permettent d'exécuter des tâches d'arrière-plan dans différents process, et potentiellement, sur plusieurs serveurs.

```Python
item: Item = Body(embed=True)
```

Voici un exemple complet :

{* ../../docs_src/body_multiple_params/tutorial005_an_py310.py hl[17] *}

Dans ce cas **FastAPI** attendra un body semblable à :

```JSON hl_lines="2"
{
    "item": {
        "name": "Foo",

cause issues during reconstruction ([#61446](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/61446)) and with containerized kubelets ([#61456](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/61456)). The workaround for this issue is to specify the complete path in the hostPath volume. Use of subPathmounts nested within atomic writer volumes (configmap, secret, downwardAPI, projected) does not work ([#61545](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/61545)), and socket files cannot be loaded from...

Mas antes disso, controlar código assíncrono era bem mais complexo e difícil.

Nas versões anteriores do Python, você poderia utilizar threads ou <a href="http://www.gevent.org/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Gevent</a>. Mas o código é bem mais complexo de entender, debugar, e pensar sobre.

                    }
                }
            }
        }

        /**
         * Sets the finished flag to indicate whether the process has completed.
         * @param finished True if the process has finished, false otherwise.
         */
        public void setFinished(final boolean finished) {
            this.finished = finished;
        }

        /**

internal fun BufferedSource.readMedium(): Int =
  (
    readByte() and 0xff shl 16
      or (readByte() and 0xff shl 8)
      or (readByte() and 0xff)
  )

/** Run [block] until it either throws an [IOException] or completes. */
internal inline fun ignoreIoExceptions(block: () -> Unit) {
  try {
    block()
  } catch (_: IOException) {
  }
}

internal fun Buffer.skipAll(b: Byte): Int {
  var count = 0

O mais comum é o fluxo implícito.

O mais seguro é o fluxo de código, mas ele é mais complexo para implementar, pois ele necessita mais passos. Como ele é mais complexo, muitos provedores terminam sugerindo o fluxo implícito.

/// note | Nota

///

```Python
commons: CommonQueryParams = Depends()
```

////

Declaras la dependencia como el tipo del parámetro, y usas `Depends()` sin ningún parámetro, en lugar de tener que escribir la clase completa *otra vez* dentro de `Depends(CommonQueryParams)`.

El mismo ejemplo se vería entonces así:

{* ../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial004_an_py310.py hl[19] *}

...y **FastAPI** sabrá qué hacer.