expanded_policy_count=$(./mc admin policy list myminio/ | wc -l)

if [ $user_count -ne $expanded_user_count ]; then
	echo "BUG: original user count differs from expanded setup"
	exit 1
fi

if [ $policy_count -ne $expanded_policy_count ]; then
	echo "BUG: original policy count  differs from expanded setup"
	exit 1
fi

./mc version info myminio/versioned | grep -q "versioning is enabled"
ret=$?
if [ $ret -ne 0 ]; then

## Your Environment
<!--- Include as many relevant details about the environment you experienced the bug in -->
* Version used (`minio --version`):
* Server setup and configuration:

MinIO is built ground up on the cloud-native premise. With features like erasure-coding, distributed and shared setup, it focuses only on storage and does it very well. While, it can be scaled by just replicating MinIO instances per tenant via an orchestration platform.

/**
 * Tests for {@link SmbComWriteResponse}.
 */
public class SmbComWriteResponseTest {

    private SmbComWriteResponse resp;
    private Configuration cfgMock;

    @BeforeEach
    public void setUp() {
        // create a mock configuration that satisfies constructor requirements.
        cfgMock = mock(Configuration.class);
        resp = new SmbComWriteResponse(cfgMock);
    }

    @Test

# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.
# ==============================================================================
source "${BASH_SOURCE%/*}/utilities/setup.sh"

# Record GPU count and CUDA version status
if [[ "$TFCI_NVIDIA_SMI_ENABLE" == 1 ]]; then
  tfrun nvidia-smi
fi

# Update the version numbers for Nightly only

public class SearchRequestParamsTest extends UnitFessTestCase {

    private SearchRequestParams searchRequestParams;
    private TestSearchRequestParams testParams;

    @Override
    public void setUp() throws Exception {
        super.setUp();
        testParams = new TestSearchRequestParams();
        searchRequestParams = testParams;
    }

    // Test for hasConditionQuery method
    public void test_hasConditionQuery_withQuery() {

  @JvmField @RegisterExtension
  val platform = PlatformRule()

  @JvmField @RegisterExtension
  val clientTestRule = OkHttpClientTestRule()

  private val client = clientTestRule.newClient()

  @BeforeEach fun setUp() {
    platform.assumeConscrypt()
  }

  @Test
  fun testTrustManager() {
    assertThat(Conscrypt.isConscrypt(Platform.get().platformTrustManager())).isTrue()
  }

  @Test
  @Disabled

  private static final long[] positive = new long[ARRAY_SIZE];
  private static final long[] nonzero = new long[ARRAY_SIZE];
  private static final long[] longs = new long[ARRAY_SIZE];

  @BeforeExperiment
  void setUp() {
    for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE; i++) {
      positive[i] = randomPositiveBigInteger(Long.SIZE - 2).longValue();
      nonzero[i] = randomNonZeroBigInteger(Long.SIZE - 2).longValue();

  private static final BigInteger[] positive = new BigInteger[ARRAY_SIZE];

  @Param({"DOWN", "UP", "FLOOR", "CEILING", "HALF_EVEN", "HALF_UP", "HALF_DOWN"})
  RoundingMode mode;

  @BeforeExperiment
  void setUp() {
    for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE; i++) {
      positive[i] = randomPositiveBigInteger(1024);
      nonzero1[i] = randomNonZeroBigInteger(1024);
      nonzero2[i] = randomNonZeroBigInteger(1024);
    }
  }

@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public class AbstractListTester<E extends @Nullable Object> extends AbstractCollectionTester<E> {
  /*
   * Previously we had a field named list that was initialized to the value of
   * collection in setUp(), but that caused problems when a tester changed the
   * value of list or collection but not both.
   */
  protected final List<E> getList() {
    return (List<E>) collection;
  }

  /**
   * {@inheritDoc}