t.Helper()

	if strings.Contains(gotHelpText, flag) != wantExists {
		if wantExists {
			t.Errorf("%q flag was expected but not found in help text", flag)
		} else {
			t.Errorf("%q flag was found in help text but not expected", flag)
		}
	}
}

func TestHideInheritedFlags(t *testing.T) {
	const (
		parentFlag0 = "parent-flag0"
		parentFlag1 = "parent-flag1"

				t.Errorf("Test %d: Expected expiry time to be %v, but got %v", i+1, testCase.expectedPreSignValues.Expires, parsedPreSign.Expires)
			}
			// validating presign date field.
			if testCase.expectedPreSignValues.Date.UTC().Format(iso8601Format) != parsedPreSign.Date.UTC().Format(iso8601Format) {

		t.Errorf("Age soft deleted record, expects: %v, got: %v", 0, age)
	}

	if err := DB.Delete(&user).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("No error should happen when soft delete user, but got %v", err)
	}

	if sql.NullTime(user.DeletedAt).Time.IsZero() {
		t.Fatalf("user's deleted at is zero")
	}

	sql := DB.Session(&gorm.Session{DryRun: true}).Delete(&user).Statement.SQL.String()

 * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
 * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
 * 
 * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
 * Lesser General Public License for more details.
 * 

 *         .nullsFirst()
 *         .onResultOf(getBarFunction)
 *         .nullsLast();
 * }</pre>
 *
 * Note that each chaining method returns a new ordering instance which is backed by the previous
 * instance, but has the chance to act on values <i>before</i> handing off to that backing instance.
 * As a result, it usually helps to read chained ordering expressions <i>backwards</i>. For example,

     * always contains not just the current thread's exception but also the initial thread's.
     */
    Set<Throwable> seenExceptionsLocal = seenExceptions;
    if (seenExceptionsLocal == null) {
      // TODO(cpovirk): Should we use a simpler (presumably cheaper) data structure?
      /*
       * Using weak references here could let us release exceptions earlier, but:
       *

			if tc.error == "" && err != nil {
				t.Fatalf("expected no error, got %v", err)
			}
			if tc.error != "" {
				if err == nil {
					t.Fatalf("expected error to include \"%s\" but got none", tc.error)
				}
				if !strings.Contains(err.Error(), tc.error) {
					t.Fatalf("expected \"%s\" in error, got %v", tc.error, err)
				}
			}

			commandOutput := out.String()

 *
 * This class supports [asynchronous canceling][cancel]. This is intended to have the smallest
 * blast radius possible. If an HTTP/2 stream is active, canceling will cancel that stream but not
 * the other streams sharing its connection. But if the TLS handshake is still in progress then
 * canceling may break the entire connection.
 */
class RealCall(
  val client: OkHttpClient,

"AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,

Preferably, these new classes should be 100% managed and have their implementation generated by Gradle at runtime.

It's acceptable for implementation classes to be written to fit into existing code, but new classes must not instantiate managed properties or implement getters manually.

This is preferred:

```groovy
public interface NewThing {
    Property<String> getSomeProperty()
}
```