n, err := w.Write([]byte("abcd"))
	w.Close()
	if err != nil {
		t.Errorf("DeadlineWriter should succeed but failed with %s", err)
	}
	if n != 4 {
		t.Errorf("DeadlineWriter should succeed but should have only written 4 bytes, but returned %d instead", n)
	}
}

func TestCloseOnWriter(t *testing.T) {
	writer := WriteOnClose(io.Discard)
	if writer.HasWritten() {

	}
	err := batch.Add(101, 101)
	if err == nil || !errors.Is(err, ErrBatchFull) {
		t.Fatalf("Expected err %v but got %v", ErrBatchFull, err)
	}
	if !batch.IsFull() {
		t.Fatal("Expected batch.IsFull to be true but got false")
	}
	batchLen := batch.Len()
	if batchLen != int(limit) {
		t.Fatalf("expected batch length to be %v but got %v", limit, batchLen)
	}
	keys, items, err := batch.GetAll()
	if err != nil {

		t.Errorf(fmt.Sprintf("Count should work, but got err %v", err))
	}
	if count1 != 1 {
		t.Errorf("Count with group should be 1, but got count: %v", count1)
	}

	var count2 int64
	if err := DB.Model(&Company{}).Where("name in ?", []string{"company_count_group_b", "company_count_group_c"}).Group("name").Count(&count2).Error; err != nil {
		t.Errorf(fmt.Sprintf("Count should work, but got err %v", err))
	}
	if count2 != 2 {

  }

  // Node sets are the same, but edge sets differ.
  @Test
  public void equivalent_edgeSetsDiffer() {
    network.addEdge(N1, N2, E12);

    MutableNetwork<Integer, String> g2 = createNetwork(edgeType);
    g2.addEdge(N1, N2, E13);

    assertThat(network).isNotEqualTo(g2);
  }

  // Node/edge sets are the same, but node/edge connections differ due to edge type.
  @Test

 * annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>Why use a custom annotation instead of {@code android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.Suppress}?
 * I'm not completely sure that this is the right choice, but it has various advantages:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a

			if r.Name != relation.Name {
				t.Errorf("schema %v relation name expects %v, but got %v", s, r.Name, relation.Name)
			}

			if r.Type != relation.Type {
				t.Errorf("schema %v relation name expects %v, but got %v", s, r.Type, relation.Type)
			}

			if r.Schema.Name != relation.Schema {
				t.Errorf("schema %v relation's schema expects %v, but got %v", s, relation.Schema, r.Schema.Name)
			}

		t.Errorf("Expected to get Author content %v but got: %v", NewPost.Author.Content, hnPost.Author.Content)
	}

	if hnPost.Author.ContentPtr != nil {
		t.Errorf("Expected to get nil Author contentPtr but got: %v", hnPost.Author.ContentPtr)
	}

	if NewPost.Author.Birthday.UnixMilli() != hnPost.Author.Birthday.UnixMilli() {
		t.Errorf("Expected to get Author birthday with %+v but got: %+v", NewPost.Author.Birthday, hnPost.Author.Birthday)

		t.Fatalf("No error should raise, but got %v", err)
	}

	if err = tx.First(&User{}, "name = ?", "transaction").Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("Should find saved record, but got %v", err)
	}

	user1 := *GetUser("transaction1-1", Config{})

	if err = tx.Save(&user1).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("No error should raise, but got %v", err)
	}

	}

	if err := DB.Model(&User{}).Select("name, sum(age) as total").Where("name LIKE ?", "groupby%").Group("name").Having("name = ?", "groupby1").Row().Scan(&name, &total); err != nil {
		t.Errorf("no error should happen, but got %v", err)
	}

	if name != "groupby1" || total != 660 {
		t.Errorf("name should be groupby, but got %v, total should be 660, but got %v", name, total)

    void testBuilderCommon() {
        List<String> msgs = new ArrayList<>();
        msgs.add("*****************************************************************");
        msgs.add("* Your build is requesting parallel execution, but project      *");
        msgs.add("* contains the following plugin(s) that have goals not marked   *");
        msgs.add("* as @threadSafe to support parallel building.                  *");