if err := DB.Where(&user).First(&User{}).Error; err != nil {
		t.Errorf("search with struct with association should returns no error, but got %v", err)
	}

	if err := DB.Where(user).First(&User{}).Error; err != nil {
		t.Errorf("search with struct with association should returns no error, but got %v", err)
	}
}

func TestFindInBatches(t *testing.T) {
	users := []User{
		*GetUser("find_in_batches", Config{}),

   * a hotspot optimizer bug, which should be fixed, but that's a separate, big project).
   *
   * The coding pattern above is heavily used in java.util, e.g. in ArrayList. There is a
   * RangeCheckMicroBenchmark in the JDK that was used to test this.
   *
   * But the methods in this class want to throw different exceptions, depending on the args, so it

			if err != nil && testCase.shouldPass {
				t.Errorf("Test %d: %s:  Expected to pass, but failed with: <ERROR> %s", i+1, instanceType, err.Error())
			}
			if err == nil && !testCase.shouldPass {
				t.Errorf("Test %d: %s: Expected to fail with <ERROR> \"%s\", but passed instead", i+1, instanceType, testCase.err.Error())
			}
			// Failed as expected, but does it fail for the expected reason.
			if err != nil && !testCase.shouldPass {

			t.Errorf("Test %d: %s: Expected to pass, but failed with: <ERROR> %s.", i+1, instanceType, actualErr.Error())
		}
		if actualErr == nil && !testCase.shouldPass {
			t.Errorf("Test %d: %s: Expected to fail with <ERROR> \"%s\", but passed instead.", i+1, instanceType, testCase.expectedError.Error())
		}
		// Failed as expected, but does it fail for the expected reason.
		if actualErr != nil && !testCase.shouldPass {

   * a hotspot optimizer bug, which should be fixed, but that's a separate, big project).
   *
   * The coding pattern above is heavily used in java.util, e.g. in ArrayList. There is a
   * RangeCheckMicroBenchmark in the JDK that was used to test this.
   *
   * But the methods in this class want to throw different exceptions, depending on the args, so it

 * entries may be counted in {@link Cache#size}, but will never be visible to read or write
 * operations.
 *
 * <p>Certain cache configurations will result in the accrual of periodic maintenance tasks which
 * will be performed during write operations, or during occasional read operations in the absence of
 * writes. The {@link Cache#cleanUp} method of the returned cache will also perform maintenance, but

   * elements without resizing. Note that this is not what {@link HashSet#HashSet(int)} does, but it
   * is what most users want and expect it to do.
   *
   * <p>This behavior can't be broadly guaranteed, but has been tested with OpenJDK 1.7 and 1.8.
   *
   * @param expectedSize the number of elements you expect to add to the returned set

                            errOn30,
                            Version.V20,
                            "profiles.profile.id",
                            null,
                            "must be unique but found duplicate profile with id " + profile.getId(),
                            profile);
                }

                validate30RawProfileActivation(problems, profile.getActivation(), prefix);

    pings, but it did not track whether the reply pongs were received. With this
    update OkHttp requires that every ping receive a response: if it does not
    the connection will be closed and the listener's `onFailure()` method will
    be called.

    Web sockets have always been had pings, but pings on HTTP/2 connections is

	}

	if tableType.Schema() != tblSchema {
		t.Fatalf("expected tblSchema to be %s but got %s", tblSchema, tableType.Schema())
	}

	if tableType.Name() != tblName {
		t.Fatalf("expected table name to be %s but got %s", tblName, tableType.Name())
	}

	if tableType.Type() != tblType {
		t.Fatalf("expected table type to be %s but got %s", tblType, tableType.Type())
	}

	comment, ok := tableType.Comment()