*/
    public void setDependencyCollectionRequired(String requiresDependencyCollection) {
        this.dependencyCollectionRequired = requiresDependencyCollection;
    }

    /**
     * Gets the scope of (transitive) dependencies that should be collected. Dependency collection refers to the process
     * of calculating the complete dependency tree in terms of artifact coordinates. In contrast to dependency

        do {
            try {
                send(request, response, config.getNetbiosRetryTimeout());
            }
            catch ( InterruptedIOException ioe ) {
                // second query thread to finish gets interrupted so this is expected
                if ( log.isTraceEnabled() ) {
                    log.trace("Failed to send nameservice request for " + name.name, ioe);
                }

    int hashTableBits = Integer.SIZE - Integer.numberOfLeadingZeros(mask);
    metadata =
        CompactHashing.maskCombine(metadata, hashTableBits, CompactHashing.HASH_TABLE_BITS_MASK);
  }

  /** Gets the hash table mask using the stored number of hash table bits. */
  private int hashTableMask() {
    return (1 << (metadata & CompactHashing.HASH_TABLE_BITS_MASK)) - 1;
  }

  void incrementModCount() {

			err = nil
		}
		if err != nil {
			return err
		}
	}

	delete(cache.iamPolicyDocsMap, policy)
	cache.updatedAt = time.Now()

	return nil
}

// GetPolicy - gets the policy definition. Allows specifying multiple comma
// separated policies - returns a combined policy.
func (store *IAMStoreSys) GetPolicy(name string) (policy.Policy, error) {
	if name == "" {

   * triggering different chains to be discovered by the TLS engine and our chain cleaner. In this
   * attack there's several different chains.
   *
   *
   * The victim's gets a non-CA certificate signed by a CA, and pins the CA root and/or
   * intermediate. This is business as usual.
   *
   * ```
   *   pinnedRoot (trusted by CertificatePinner)

   * a black-box test that tries to create lots of different thread-interleavings, and asserts that
   * each computation is affected by a call to {@code clear()} (and therefore gets passed to the
   * removal listener), or else is not affected by the {@code clear()} (and therefore exists in the
   * cache afterward).
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // QueuingRemovalListener

        slowPointer = slowPointer.getCause();
      }
      advanceSlowPointer = !advanceSlowPointer; // only advance every other iteration
    }
    return throwable;
  }

  /**
   * Gets a {@code Throwable} cause chain as a list. The first entry in the list will be {@code
   * throwable} followed by its cause hierarchy. Note that this is a snapshot of the cause chain and

    server.enqueue(
      MockResponse(body = "This gets leaked."),
    )
    client =
      clientTestRule.newClientBuilder()
        .connectionPool(ConnectionPool(0, 10, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS))
        .build()
    val request = Request(server.url("/"))
    client.newCall(request).execute() // Ignore the response so it gets leaked then GC'd.
    awaitGarbageCollection()

func (c *Connection) reconnected() {
	c.updateState(StateConnectionError)
	c.reconnects.Add(1)

	// Drain the outQueue, so any blocked messages can be sent.
	// We keep the queue, but start draining it, if it gets full.
	stopDraining := make(chan struct{})
	var wg sync.WaitGroup
	wg.Add(1)
	defer func() {
		close(stopDraining)
		wg.Wait()
	}()
	go func() {
		defer wg.Done()
		for {
			select {

     *
     * <p>If the combiner throws an {@code ExecutionException}, the cause of the thrown {@code
     * ExecutionException} will be extracted and returned as the cause of the new {@code
     * ExecutionException} that gets thrown by the returned combined future.
     *
     * <p>Canceling this future will attempt to cancel all the component futures.
     *