if !testCase.success && err == nil {
				t.Error("expected failure but success instead")
			}
			if testCase.success && err != nil {
				t.Errorf("expected success but failed instead %s", err)
			}
			if testCase.success && !reflect.DeepEqual(testCase.expectedPatterns, gotPatterns) {
				t.Errorf("expected patterns %s but got %s", testCase.expectedPatterns, gotPatterns)
			}
		})
	}

			if err != nil && testCase.success {
				t.Errorf("Test %d: Expected success but failed instead %s", i+1, err)
			}
			if err == nil && !testCase.success {
				t.Errorf("Test %d: Expected failure but passed instead", i+1)
			}
		})
	}
}

func TestGetDivisibleSize(t *testing.T) {
	testCases := []struct {
		totalSizes []uint64

        /* windows98 has what appears to be another 4 0's followed by the share
         * name as a zero terminated ascii string "\TMP" + '\0'
         *
         * As is this works, but it deviates from the spec section 4.1.6.6 but
         * maybe I should put it in. Wonder what NT does?
         */

        return dstIndex - start;
    }
    int writeDataWireFormat( byte[] dst, int dstIndex ) {
        return 0;
    }

 *       are called <i>cryptographic hash functions</i>. But, whenever it is learned that either of
 *       these feats has become computationally feasible, the function is deemed "broken" and should
 *       no longer be used for secure purposes. (This is the likely eventual fate of <i>all</i>
 *       cryptographic hashes.)
 *   <li><b>fast:</b> perhaps self-explanatory, but often the most important consideration.
 * </ul>
 *

			var filter Filter
			err := xml.Unmarshal([]byte(tc.inputXML), &filter)
			if err != nil {
				t.Fatalf("%d: Expected no error but got %v", i+1, err)
			}
			err = filter.Validate()
			if err != tc.expectedErr {
				t.Fatalf("%d: Expected %v but got %v", i+1, tc.expectedErr, err)
			}
		})
	}
}

func TestObjectSizeFilters(t *testing.T) {
	f1 := Filter{
		set: true,

func recoverTest(i int, shouldPass bool, t *testing.T) {
	if err := recover(); err == nil && !shouldPass {
		t.Errorf("Test %d should fail but passed successfully", i)
	} else if err != nil && shouldPass {
		t.Errorf("Test %d should pass but failed: %v", i, err)
	}
}

var generateKeyTests = []struct {
	ExtKey     [32]byte
	Random     io.Reader
	ShouldPass bool
}{

 * annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>Why use a custom annotation instead of {@code android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.Suppress}?
 * I'm not completely sure that this is the right choice, but it has various advantages:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a

		t.Errorf("Name fields shouldn't be changed if untouched, but got %v", animal.Name)
	}

	// When changing a field with a default value, the change must occur
	animal.Name = "amazing horse"
	DB.Save(&animal)
	DB.First(&animal, animal.Counter)
	if animal.Name != "amazing horse" {
		t.Errorf("Update a filed with a default value should occur. But got %v\n", animal.Name)
	}

		t.Errorf("errors happened when update: %v", res.Error)
	} else if res.RowsAffected != 1 {
		t.Errorf("rows affected should be 1, but got : %v", res.RowsAffected)
	} else if user.Age != 5 {
		t.Errorf("Age should equals to 5, but got %v", user.Age)
	} else if user.Active != true {
		t.Errorf("Active should be true, but got %v", user.Active)
	}
	checkUpdatedAtChanged("Updates with map", user.UpdatedAt)
	checkOtherData("Updates with map")

	}

	var result ScannerValuerStruct

	if err := DB.Find(&result, "id = ?", data.ID).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("no error should happen when query scanner, valuer struct, but got %v", err)
	}

	if result.ExampleStructPtr.Val != "value2" {
		t.Errorf(`ExampleStructPtr.Val should equal to "value2", but got %v`, result.ExampleStructPtr.Val)
	}