* @param length the length of the new array
   */
  /*
   * The new array contains nulls, even if the old array did not. If we wanted to be accurate, we
   * would declare a return type of `@Nullable T[]`. However, we've decided not to think too hard
   * about arrays for now, as they're a mess. (We previously discussed this in the review of
   * ObjectArrays, which is the main caller of this method.)
   */

      // If either of these reads return null then we must be after a successful cancel or another
      // call to this method.
      TimeoutFuture<V> timeoutFuture = timeoutFutureRef;
      if (timeoutFuture == null) {
        return;
      }
      ListenableFuture<V> delegate = timeoutFuture.delegateRef;
      if (delegate == null) {
        return;
      }

      /*

   *
   * When we reference FinalizableReferenceQueue in this test, we are referencing a class that is
   * loaded by this test and that will obviously remain loaded for as long as the test is running.
   * So in order to check ClassLoader garbage collection we need to create a new ClassLoader and
   * make it load its own version of FinalizableReferenceQueue. Then we need to interact with that

  /** Create the FRQ in a method that goes out of scope so that we're sure it will be reclaimed. */
  private void weaklyReferenceQueue() {
    frq = new FinalizableReferenceQueue();
    queueReference = new WeakReference<>(frq.queue);

    /*
     * Queue and clear a reference for good measure. We test later on that
     * the finalizer thread stopped, but we should test that it actually
     * started first.
     */

  /** Create the FRQ in a method that goes out of scope so that we're sure it will be reclaimed. */
  private void weaklyReferenceQueue() {
    frq = new FinalizableReferenceQueue();
    queueReference = new WeakReference<>(frq.queue);

    /*
     * Queue and clear a reference for good measure. We test later on that
     * the finalizer thread stopped, but we should test that it actually
     * started first.
     */

          public void run() {
            do {
              // We can't have a GOLDEN_NOT_PRESENT_KEY because false positives are
              // possible! It's false negatives that can't happen.
              assertThat(bloomFilter.mightContain(GOLDEN_PRESENT_KEY)).isTrue();

              int key = getNonGoldenRandomKey();
              // We can't check that the key is mightContain() == false before the

  LazyLogger(Class<?> ownerOfLogger) {
    this.loggerName = ownerOfLogger.getName();
  }

  Logger get() {
    /*
     * We use double-checked locking. We could the try racy single-check idiom, but that would
     * depend on Logger not contain mutable state.
     *
     * We could use Suppliers.memoizingSupplier here, but I micro-optimized to this implementation

   * that have nullable bounds? Unfortunately, if we change the parameter to TypeParameter<? extends
   * @Nullable X>, then users might pass a TypeParameter<Y>, where Y is a subtype of X, while still
   * passing a TypeToken<X>. This would be invalid. Maybe we could accept a TypeParameter<@PolyNull
   * X> if we support such a thing? It would be weird or misleading for users to be able to pass

   * a duration in order to call a legacy API which requires a {@code long, TimeUnit} pair.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings({
    // We use this method only for cases in which we need to decompose to primitives.
    "GoodTime-ApiWithNumericTimeUnit",
    "GoodTime-DecomposeToPrimitive",
    // We use this method only from within APIs that require a Duration.
    "Java7ApiChecker",
  })
  @IgnoreJRERequirement

   * a duration in order to call a legacy API which requires a {@code long, TimeUnit} pair.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings({
    // We use this method only for cases in which we need to decompose to primitives.
    "GoodTime-ApiWithNumericTimeUnit",
    "GoodTime-DecomposeToPrimitive",
    // We use this method only from within APIs that require a Duration.
    "Java7ApiChecker",
  })
  @IgnoreJRERequirement