NbtAddress[] addressArray;

    /* It is a little awkward but prudent to pass the quering address
     * so that it may be included in the list of results. IOW we do
     * not want to create a new NbtAddress object for this particular
     * address from which the query is constructed, we want to populate
     * the data of the existing address that should be one of several
     * returned by the node status.
     */

    //     in all.
    // (3) "Successive". We can consider that we are exchanging a block of size d (a[0..d-1]) with a
    //     block of size n-d (a[d..n-1]), where in general these blocks have different sizes. If we
    //     imagine a line separating the first block from the second, we can proceed by exchanging

      assertTrue(afterBurst >= 1000);
    }
  }

  /**
   * This neat test shows that no matter what weights we use in our requests, if we push X amount of
   * permits in a cool state, where X = rate * timeToCoolDown, and we have specified a
   * timeToWarmUp() period, it will cost as the prescribed amount of time. E.g., calling
   * [acquire(5), acquire(1)] takes exactly the same time as [acquire(2), acquire(3), acquire(1)].
   */

  }

  /*
   * TODO(b/242884182): Figure out why this helps produce the same class file when we compile most
   * of common.collect a second time with the results of the first compilation on the classpath. Or
   * just back this out once we stop doing that (which we'll do after our internal GWT setup
   * changes).
   */
  @Override
  public ImmutableMap<Object, Collection<Object>> asMap() {

    }

    /**
     * Setup exactly the same as the above test, except that the child project
     * now depends upon d, which has a transitive dependency on c.  Even though
     * we did list an exclusion on c, it was only from within the context of
     * project b.  We will pick up project c in this case because no
     * restrictions were placed on d.  This demonstrates that a, b, c, & d will
     * all be collected.
     *

   * assigned array element, when seen as an unsigned value. So if {@code table} is a {@code byte[]}
   * then we should have {@code 0 ≤ entry ≤ 255}, and if {@code table} is a {@code short[]} then we
   * should have {@code 0 ≤ entry ≤ 65535}. It is the caller's responsibility to ensure this.
   */
  static void tableSet(Object table, int index, int entry) {

   * assigned array element, when seen as an unsigned value. So if {@code table} is a {@code byte[]}
   * then we should have {@code 0 ≤ entry ≤ 255}, and if {@code table} is a {@code short[]} then we
   * should have {@code 0 ≤ entry ≤ 65535}. It is the caller's responsibility to ensure this.
   */
  static void tableSet(Object table, int index, int entry) {

  }

  @CheckForNull
  private MoveDesc<E> fillHole(int index, E toTrickle) {
    Heap heap = heapForIndex(index);
    // We consider elementData(index) a "hole", and we want to fill it
    // with the last element of the heap, toTrickle.
    // Since the last element of the heap is from the bottom level, we
    // optimistically fill index position with elements from lower levels,

   * creation and removal (including automatic removal of zeroes). If the modification of an
   * AtomicInteger results in zero, we compareAndSet the value to zero; if that succeeds, we remove
   * the entry from the Map. If another operation sees a zero in the map, it knows that the entry is
   * about to be removed, so this operation may remove it (often by replacing it with a new

         * unique within a single POM. Upon multiple declarations, 2.x just kept the last one but retained the order of
         * the first occurrence. So when we're in lenient/compat mode, we have to deal with such broken POMs and mimic
         * the way 2.x works. When we're in strict mode, the removal of duplicates just saves other merging steps from
         * aftereffects and bogus error messages.
         */