Par exemple, il était clair que l'idéal était de se baser sur les annotations de type Python standard.

De plus, la meilleure approche était d'utiliser des normes déjà existantes.

Ainsi, avant même de commencer à coder **FastAPI**, j'ai passé plusieurs mois à étudier les spécifications d'OpenAPI, JSON Schema, OAuth2, etc. Comprendre leurs relations, leurs similarités et leurs différences.

hara
hari
hark
hartan
hau
hauei
hauek
hauetan
hemen
hemendik
hemengo
hi
hona
honek
honela
honetan
honi
hor
hori
horiei
horiek
horietan
horko
horra
horrek
horrela
horretan
horri
hortik
hura
izan
ni
noiz
nola
non
nondik
nongo
nor
nora
ze
zein
zen
zenbait
zenbat
zer
zergatik
ziren
zituen
zu
zuek

```Python hl_lines="6-7"
{!../../../docs_src/path_params/tutorial001.py!}
```

El valor del parámetro de path `item_id` será pasado a tu función como el argumento `item_id`.

Entonces, si corres este ejemplo y vas a <a href="http://127.0.0.1:8000/items/foo" class="external-link" target="_blank">http://127.0.0.1:8000/items/foo</a>, verás una respuesta de:

```JSON
{"item_id":"foo"}
```

    * **Robuste** : Obtenez du code prêt pour être utilisé en production. Avec de la documentation automatique interactive.

    * Si estás comparando Uvicorn, compáralo con los servidores de aplicaciones Daphne, Hypercorn, uWSGI, etc.
* **Starlette**:
    * Tendrá el siguiente mejor desempeño, después de Uvicorn. De hecho, Starlette usa Uvicorn para correr. Por lo tanto, probablemente sólo pueda volverse "más lento" que Uvicorn al tener que ejecutar más código.

	// InsecureSkipVerify skips client verification the server's certificate chain and host name.
	InsecureSkipVerify bool

	// XDSSAN is the expected Subject Alternative Name of the XDS server
	XDSSAN string

	// Plaintext forces plain text communication (for talking to port 15010)
	Plaintext bool

	// GCP project number or ID to use for XDS calls, if any.
	GCPProject string

	// Istiod address. For MCP may be different than Xds.

        # GPU:
        *manylinux*)     LARGEST_OK_SIZE=580 ;;
        # Unknown:
        *)
            echo "The wheel's name is in an unknown format."
            exit 1
            ;;
    esac
    # >&3 forces output in bats even if the test passes. See
    # https://bats-core.readthedocs.io/en/stable/writing-tests.html#printing-to-the-terminal
    echo "# Size of $TF_WHEEL is $WHEEL_MEGABYTES / $LARGEST_OK_SIZE megabytes." >&3

      }
    }

    throw new IllegalArgumentException(
        Platform.format("key %s not found in entries %s", newEntry.getKey(), expected));
  }

  /**
   * Wrapper for {@link Map#get(Object)} that forces the caller to pass in a key of the same type as
   * the map. Besides being slightly shorter than code that uses {@link #getMap()}, it also ensures
   * that callers don't pass an {@link Entry} by mistake.
   */

    return new WeakReference<>(shadowLoader);
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): It would be great to run all these tests (including class unloading) in an
   * environment that forces Futures.getChecked to its fallback WeakSetValidator. One awful way of
   * doing so would be to derive a separate test library by using remove_from_jar to strip out
   * ClassValueValidator.
   *

When deploying applications you will probably want to have some **replication of processes** to take advantage of **multiple cores** and to be able to handle more requests.

As you saw in the previous chapter about [Deployment Concepts](concepts.md){.internal-link target=_blank}, there are multiple strategies you can use.