}

  public void testJoinTimeoutMultiInterruptExpired() {
    /*
     * We don't "need" to schedule a thread completion at all here, but by doing
     * so, we come the closest we can to testing that the wait time is
     * appropriately decreased on each progressive join() call.
     */
    TimedThread thread = TimedThread.createWithDelay(LONG_DELAY_MS);
    repeatedlyInterruptTestThread(20, tearDownStack);

            byte[] buf = new byte[1024];

            for (int ii = 0; ii < numIter; ii++) {

                synchronized (this) {
                    ltime = System.currentTimeMillis();
                    wait();
                }

                try {
                    double r = Math.random();
                    if (r < 0.333) {
                        f.exists();
//                      System.out.print('e');

    manager.startAsync();
    afterStarted.countDown();
    // We do not call awaitHealthy because, due to races, that method may throw an exception.  But
    // we really just want to wait for the thread to be in the failure callback so we wait for that
    // explicitly instead.
    failEnter.await();
    assertFalse("State should be updated before calling listeners", manager.isHealthy());
    // now we want to stop the services.

   * than the given time. The manager will become healthy after all the component services have
   * reached the {@linkplain State#RUNNING running} state.
   *
   * @param timeout the maximum time to wait
   * @param unit the time unit of the timeout argument
   * @throws TimeoutException if not all of the services have finished starting within the deadline

      if (i == 10) {
        new Thread(() -> latch.countDown()).start();
      }

      future.addListener(listenerLatch::countDown, exec);
    }

    assertSame(Boolean.TRUE, future.get());
    // Wait for the listener latch to complete.
    listenerLatch.await(500, MILLISECONDS);

    exec.shutdown();
    exec.awaitTermination(500, MILLISECONDS);
  }

 *       <a href="https://developer.android.com/studio/build/shrink-code">R8 and Proguard</a>.
 *   <li>It doesn't offer a way to wait for multiple events before taking action. For example, it
 *       doesn't offer a way to wait for multiple producers to all report that they're "ready," nor
 *       does it offer a way to batch multiple events from a single producer together.

    // observe a size of 1
    long initialSize = cache.size();
    assertTrue(initialSize == 1 || initialSize == 2);

    // wait up to 5s
    byte[] filler = new byte[1024];
    for (int i = 0; i < 500; i++) {
      System.gc();

      CacheTesting.drainReferenceQueues(cache);
      if (cache.size() == 1) {
        break;
      }

    @Override
    public boolean cancel(boolean mayInterruptIfRunning) {
      throw new AssertionFailedError();
    }

    @Override
    public V get() throws InterruptedException {
      /*
       * Wait a little to give us time to call addListener before the future's
       * value is set in addition to the call we'll make after then.
       */
      allowGetToComplete.await(1, SECONDS);

      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Cleans up the given reference and any other references already in the queue. Catches and logs
   * all throwables.
   *
   * @return true if the caller should continue to wait for more references to be added to the
   *     queue, false if the associated FinalizableReferenceQueue is no longer referenced.
   */
  private boolean cleanUp(Reference<?> firstReference) {

    static final int NET_SERVER_ENUM2 = 0x0068;
    static final int NET_SERVER_ENUM3 = 0x00D7;

    static final byte TRANS_PEEK_NAMED_PIPE     = (byte)0x23;
    static final byte TRANS_WAIT_NAMED_PIPE     = (byte)0x53;
    static final byte TRANS_CALL_NAMED_PIPE     = (byte)0x54;
    static final byte TRANS_TRANSACT_NAMED_PIPE = (byte)0x26;

    protected int primarySetupOffset;