exec.execute(task);
    runLatch.await();
    taskLatch.countDown();

    ExecutionException e = assertThrows(ExecutionException.class, () -> task.get(5, SECONDS));
    assertEquals(IllegalStateException.class, e.getCause().getClass());

    assertTrue(listenerLatch.await(5, SECONDS));
    assertTrue(task.isDone());
    assertFalse(task.isCancelled());
  }

  public void testListenerCalledOnCancelFromNotRunning() throws Exception {

		avg = l.rttMsSum / float64(l.successRequestCount)
	}
	now := time.Now().UTC()
	return Metrics{
		LastReachableSecs:   now.Sub(o.serviceMetrics.LastCheckSuccess).Seconds(),
		LastUnreachableSecs: now.Sub(o.serviceMetrics.LastCheckFailure).Seconds(),
		TotalRequests:       l.failedRequestCount + l.successRequestCount,
		FailedRequests:      l.failedRequestCount,
		AvgSuccRTTMs:        avg,
		MaxSuccRTTMs:        l.maxRttMs,

	var (
		// We check every 15 seconds if the disk is writable and we can read back.
		checkEvery = 15 * time.Second

		// If the disk has completed an operation successfully within last 5 seconds, don't check it.
		skipIfSuccessBefore = 5 * time.Second
	)

	// if disk max timeout is smaller than checkEvery window
	// reduce checks by a second.
	if globalDriveConfig.GetMaxTimeout() <= checkEvery {

```Python
if not (credentials.username == "stanleyjobson") or not (credentials.password == "swordfish"):
    # Return some error
    ...
```

But by using the `secrets.compare_digest()` it will be secure against a type of attacks called "timing attacks".

### Timing Attacks

But what's a "timing attack"?

Let's imagine some attackers are trying to guess the username and password.

  public void testParse_writeExpirationSeconds() {
    CacheBuilderSpec spec = parse("expireAfterWrite=10s");
    assertEquals(SECONDS, spec.writeExpirationTimeUnit);
    assertEquals(10L, spec.writeExpirationDuration);
    assertCacheBuilderEquivalence(
        CacheBuilder.newBuilder().expireAfterWrite(10L, SECONDS), CacheBuilder.from(spec));
  }

  public void testParse_writeExpirationRepeated() {
    assertThrows(

    @SuppressWarnings("unused")
    public static final WithPublicConstants SECOND = new WithPublicConstants();
  }

  private static class FirstConstantIsNull {
    // To test that null constant is ignored
    @SuppressWarnings("unused")
    public static final @Nullable FirstConstantIsNull FIRST = null;

    public static final FirstConstantIsNull SECOND = new FirstConstantIsNull();
  }

  @get:JvmName("connectTimeoutMillis")
  val connectTimeoutMillis: Int = builder.connectTimeout

  /** Default read timeout (in milliseconds). The default is 10 seconds. */
  @get:JvmName("readTimeoutMillis")
  val readTimeoutMillis: Int = builder.readTimeout

  /** Default write timeout (in milliseconds). The default is 10 seconds. */
  @get:JvmName("writeTimeoutMillis")

    assertTrue(latch.await(5, SECONDS));
    assertTrue(future.isDone());
    assertFalse(future.isCancelled());

    assertEquals(expectedValue, future.get());
  }

  public void testCancelledFuture() throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {
    assertTrue(future.isDone());
    assertTrue(future.isCancelled());

    assertTrue(latch.await(5, SECONDS));
    assertTrue(future.isDone());

   *
   * How this works is best explained with an example:
   *
   * For a RateLimiter that produces 1 token per second, every second that goes by with the
   * RateLimiter being unused, we increase storedPermits by 1. Say we leave the RateLimiter unused
   * for 10 seconds (i.e., we expected a request at time X, but we are at time X + 10 seconds before
   * a request actually arrives; this is also related to the point made in the last paragraph), thus

            ImmutableSet.of(
                DurationSpec.of(0, SECONDS), DurationSpec.of(1, SECONDS), DurationSpec.of(1, DAYS)))
        .withExpireAfterAccesses(
            ImmutableSet.of(
                DurationSpec.of(0, SECONDS), DurationSpec.of(1, SECONDS), DurationSpec.of(1, DAYS)))
        .withRefreshes(ImmutableSet.of(DurationSpec.of(1, SECONDS), DurationSpec.of(1, DAYS)));
  }