* Returns a fixed-size list backed by the specified array, similar to {@link
   * Arrays#asList(Object[])}. The list supports {@link List#set(int, Object)}, but any attempt to
   * set a value to {@code null} will result in a {@link NullPointerException}.
   *
   * <p>The returned list maintains the values, but not the identities, of {@code Integer} objects
   * written to or read from it. For example, whether {@code list.get(0) == list.get(0)} is true for

AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE
DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR

   * suppression externally, but it's OK because we don't enforce test-size rules there.)
   *
   * We'd just use PackageSanityTests directly, saving us from needing this separate type, but we're
   * currently skipping MediumTests on Android, and we skip them by not making them present at
   * runtime at all. I could just make _this_ test a MediumTest, but then it wouldn't run on

		// fmt.Println(output)
		switch {
		case testCase.dlURL == "" && output != "":
			t.Errorf("Testcase %d: no newer release available but got an update message: %s", i+1, output)
		case output == "" && testCase.dlURL != "" && testCase.older > 0:
			t.Errorf("Testcase %d: newer release is available but got empty update message!", i+1)
		case output == "" && (testCase.dlURL == "" || testCase.older <= 0):
			// Valid no update message case. No further

          .put("MD5", Hashing.md5())
          .put("SHA", Hashing.sha1()) // Not the official name, but still works
          .put("SHA1", Hashing.sha1()) // Not the official name, but still works
          .put("sHa-1", Hashing.sha1()) // Not the official name, but still works
          .put("SHA-1", Hashing.sha1())
          .put("SHA-256", Hashing.sha256())
          .put("SHA-384", Hashing.sha384())

 * implicit target of the methods {@link #peek()}, {@link #poll()} and {@link #remove()} -- is
 * defined as the <i>least</i> element in the queue according to the queue's comparator. But unlike
 * a regular priority queue, the methods {@link #peekLast}, {@link #pollLast} and {@link
 * #removeLast} are also provided, to act on the <i>greatest</i> element in the queue instead.
 *

  }

  // TODO(cpovirk): instead of skipping, use a smaller number of steps
  @GwtIncompatible // works but takes 5 minutes to run
  public void testPeekingIteratorBehavesLikeIteratorOnThreeElementIterable() {
    actsLikeIteratorHelper(Lists.newArrayList("A", "B", "C"));
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // works but takes 5 minutes to run
  public void testPeekingIteratorAcceptsNullElements() {

import java.util.concurrent.Future

/**
 * See https://github.com/gradle/gradle-private/issues/3919
 *
 * When merging `releaseX` branch into `master`, we should only use the release note from the `master` branch,
 * but sometimes changes on release notes.md was brought to master and merged unnoticed,
 * e.g https://github.com/gradle/gradle/pull/25825
 *

public class AbstractSetTester<E> extends AbstractCollectionTester<E> {
  /*
   * Previously we had a field named set that was initialized to the value of
   * collection in setUp(), but that caused problems when a tester changed the
   * value of set or collection but not both.
   */
  protected final Set<E> getSet() {
    return (Set<E>) collection;
  }

/**
 * Outer class that exists solely to let us write {@code Partially.GwtIncompatible} instead of plain
 * {@code GwtIncompatible}. This is more accurate for {@link Futures#catching}, which is available
 * under GWT but with a slightly different signature.
 *
 * <p>We can't use {@code PartiallyGwtIncompatible} because then the GWT compiler wouldn't recognize