.put("sHa-1", sha1()) // Not the official name, but still works
          .put("SHA-1", sha1())
          .put("SHA-256", sha256())
          .put("SHA-384", sha384())
          .put("SHA-512", sha512())
          .build();

  public void testHashing() throws Exception {
    for (String stringToTest : INPUTS) {
      for (String algorithmToTest : ALGORITHMS.keySet()) {

            logger.lifecycle("Removing unused sha " + shaFile.getName());
            shaFile.delete();
        }
    }

    private void createSha(File dependency, String jarName, File shaFile) throws IOException, NoSuchAlgorithmException {
        logger.lifecycle("Adding sha for " + jarName);

        String sha = parentTask.get().getSha1(dependency);

  }

  /**
   * Returns a hash function implementing the SHA-1 algorithm (160 hash bits).
   *
   * @deprecated If you must interoperate with a system that requires SHA-1, then use this method,
   *     despite its deprecation. But if you can choose your hash function, avoid SHA-1, which is
   *     neither fast nor secure. As of January 2017, we suggest:
   *     <ul>

    };
    ;

    abstract byte[] hash(Algorithm algorithm, byte[] input);
  }

  private enum Algorithm {
    MD5("MD5", Hashing.md5()),
    SHA_1("SHA-1", Hashing.sha1()),
    SHA_256("SHA-256", Hashing.sha256()),
    SHA_384("SHA-384", Hashing.sha384()),
    SHA_512("SHA-512", Hashing.sha512());

    private final String algorithmName;
    private final HashFunction hashFn;

        if (ignoreShas.contains(depName)) {
            // local deps should not have sha files!
            if (getShaFile(jarName).exists()) {
                throw new GradleException("SHA file " + getShaFile(jarName) + " exists for ignored dependency " + depName);
            }
        } else {
            logger.info("Checking sha for {}", jarName);
            checkSha(dependency, jarName, shaFiles);
        }
    }

        assertEquals("31f30ddbcb1bf8446576f0e64aa4c88a9f055e3c", MessageDigestUtil.digest("SHA-1", text));
        assertEquals("ecb666d778725ec97307044d642bf4d160aabb76f56c0069c71ea25b1e926825", MessageDigestUtil.digest("SHA-256", text));

        try {
            MessageDigestUtil.digest(null, text);
            assertTrue(false);

/**
 * Benchmarks for comparing instance creation of {@link MessageDigest}s.
 *
 * @author Kurt Alfred Kluever
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class MessageDigestCreationBenchmark {

  @Param({"MD5", "SHA-1", "SHA-256", "SHA-384", "SHA-512"})
  private String algorithm;

  private MessageDigest md;

  @BeforeExperiment
  void setUp() throws Exception {
    md = MessageDigest.getInstance(algorithm);
  }

  @Benchmark

    @JvmStatic
    fun X509Certificate.sha256Hash(): ByteString = publicKey.encoded.toByteString().sha256()

    /**
     * Returns the SHA-256 of `certificate`'s public key.
     *
     * In OkHttp 3.1.2 and earlier, this returned a SHA-1 hash of the public key. Both types are
     * supported, but SHA-256 is preferred.
     */
    @JvmStatic
    fun pin(certificate: Certificate): String {

          .put("sHa-1", sha1()) // Not the official name, but still works
          .put("SHA-1", sha1())
          .put("SHA-256", sha256())
          .put("SHA-384", sha384())
          .put("SHA-512", sha512())
          .build();

  public void testHashing() throws Exception {
    for (String stringToTest : INPUTS) {
      for (String algorithmToTest : ALGORITHMS.keySet()) {

    // Default configuration
    private static final int DEFAULT_HASH_ALGORITHM = HASH_ALGO_SHA512;
    private static final int SALT_SIZE = 32; // 32 bytes as per SMB 3.1.1 spec
    private static final int HASH_SIZE_SHA512 = 64; // SHA-512 produces 64-byte hashes

    // Session-specific preauth integrity contexts
    private final ConcurrentMap<String, PreauthIntegrityContext> sessionContexts = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();

    // Security configuration