## 0.104.1

### Fixes

* 📌 Pin Swagger UI version to 5.9.0 temporarily to handle a bug crashing it in 5.9.1. PR [#10529](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/10529) by [@alejandraklachquin](https://github.com/alejandraklachquin).

    // backward map ordered by country (even for currency values)
    assertThat(bimap.inverse().values()).containsExactly(Currency.DOLLAR, Currency.PESO).inOrder();
  }

  public void testEntrySet() {
    // Bug 3168290
    Map<Currency, Country> map =
        ImmutableMap.of(
            Currency.DOLLAR, Country.CANADA,
            Currency.PESO, Country.CHILE,
            Currency.FRANC, Country.SWITZERLAND);

    assertThat(newArray).isEqualTo(new byte[] {(byte) 0, (byte) 1, (byte) 2});
    newArray[1] = (byte) 5;
    assertThat((byte) list.get(1)).isEqualTo((byte) 1);
  }

  // This test stems from a real bug found by andrewk
  public void testAsList_subList_toArray_roundTrip() {
    byte[] array = {(byte) 0, (byte) 1, (byte) 2, (byte) 3};
    List<Byte> list = Bytes.asList(array);

        assertThrows(PACDecodingException.class, () -> {
            unicodeString.check("");
        });

        // The implementation has a bug - it doesn't handle null properly
        // It throws NullPointerException instead of returning null
        // This is a known issue in the production code
        assertThrows(NullPointerException.class, () -> {

            return hashBytes(input.toString().getBytes(charset));
          }
          i++;
          buffer |= codePointToFourUtf8Bytes(codePoint) << shift;
          if (supplementaryPlaneFix) { // bug compatibility: earlier versions did not have this add
            shift += 32;
          }
          len += 4;
        }

        if (shift >= 32) {
          int k1 = mixK1((int) buffer);

Das ist, wie es sein sollte, denn wenn Sie einen Pydantic-`ValidationError` in Ihrer *Response* oder irgendwo sonst in ihrem Code haben (es sei denn, im *Request* des Clients), ist das tatsächlich ein Bug in ihrem Code.

Und während Sie den Fehler beheben, sollten ihre Clients/Benutzer keinen Zugriff auf interne Informationen über den Fehler haben, da das eine Sicherheitslücke aufdecken könnte.

   *    permit retries.)
   *  * If OkHttp already attempted to transmit the request body, and [RequestBody.isOneShot] is
   *    true.
   *
   * It won't retry if the exception is a bug or a configuration problem, such as:
   *
   *  * If the remote peer is untrusted: [exception] is an [SSLPeerUnverifiedException].
   *  * If received data is unexpected: [exception] is a [ProtocolException].
   *

* Back porting critical vSphere bug fixes to release 1.3 ([#31993](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/31993), [@dagnello](https://github.com/dagnello))
* Back port - Openstack provider allowing more than one service port for lbaas v2 ([#32001](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/32001), [@dagnello](https://github.com/dagnello))

  }

  @J2ktIncompatible // Kotlin Native's regex is based on Apache Harmony, like old Android
  @GwtIncompatible // java.util.regex.Pattern
  @AndroidIncompatible // Bug in older versions of Android we test against, since fixed.
  public void testPatternSplitLookBehind() {
    if (!CommonPattern.isPcreLike()) {
      return;
    }
    String toSplit = ":foo::barbaz:";

      val reference = references[i]

      if (reference.get() != null) {
        i++
        continue
      }

      // We've discovered a leaked call. This is an application bug.
      val callReference = reference as CallReference
      val message =
        "A connection to ${connection.route().address.url} was leaked. " +
          "Did you forget to close a response body?"