}

  /**
   * Returns an immutable array containing the given values, in order.
   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> this method delegates to {@link #copyOf(Collection)} if {@code
   * values} is a {@link Collection}. Otherwise it creates a {@link #builder} and uses {@link
   * Builder#addAll(Iterable)}, with all the performance implications associated with that.
   */
  public static ImmutableIntArray copyOf(Iterable<Integer> values) {

  }

  /**
   * Returns an immutable array containing the given values, in order.
   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> this method delegates to {@link #copyOf(Collection)} if {@code
   * values} is a {@link Collection}. Otherwise it creates a {@link #builder} and uses {@link
   * Builder#addAll(Iterable)}, with all the performance implications associated with that.
   */
  public static ImmutableDoubleArray copyOf(Iterable<Double> values) {

        if (value instanceof Entity) {
            data.register(key, BeanUtil.copyBeanToNewMap(value));
        } else {
            if ((value instanceof final Collection<?> coll) && !coll.isEmpty()) {
                // care performance for List that the most frequent pattern
                final Object first = coll instanceof List<?> ? ((List<?>) coll).get(0) : coll.iterator().next();
                if (first instanceof Entity) {

/**
 * Provides similar behavior to {@link String#intern} for any immutable type. Common implementations
 * are available from the {@link Interners} class.
 *
 * <p>Note that {@code String.intern()} has some well-known performance limitations, and should
 * generally be avoided. Prefer {@link Interners#newWeakInterner} or another {@code Interner}
 * implementation even for {@code String} interning.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @since 3.0

    }
    boolean[] octets = new boolean[maxChar + 1];
    for (char c : safeCharArray) {
      octets[c] = true;
    }
    return octets;
  }

  /*
   * Overridden for performance. For unescaped strings this improved the performance of the uri
   * escaper from ~760ns to ~400ns as measured by {@link CharEscapersBenchmark}.
   */
  @Override
  protected int nextEscapeIndex(CharSequence csq, int index, int end) {

import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.LinkedHashSet;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Random;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.TreeSet;

/**
 * Provides supporting data for performance notes in the documentation of {@link
 * Ordering#sortedCopy} and {@link Ordering#immutableSortedCopy}, as well as for automated code
 * suggestions.
 *
 */
public class SortedCopyBenchmark {

  }

  /**
   * Returns an immutable array containing the given values, in order.
   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> this method delegates to {@link #copyOf(Collection)} if {@code
   * values} is a {@link Collection}. Otherwise it creates a {@link #builder} and uses {@link
   * Builder#addAll(Iterable)}, with all the performance implications associated with that.
   */
  public static ImmutableLongArray copyOf(Iterable<Long> values) {

      this.safeMinChar = (char) safeMin;
      this.safeMaxChar = (char) Math.min(safeMax, Character.MIN_HIGH_SURROGATE - 1);
    }
  }

  /*
   * This is overridden to improve performance. Rough benchmarking shows that this almost doubles
   * the speed when processing strings that do not require any escaping.
   */
  @Override
  public final String escape(String s) {

 * with short strings already known to be free of unpaired surrogates.
 *
 * <p>The two primary implementations of this interface are {@link CharEscaper} and {@link
 * UnicodeEscaper}. They are heavily optimized for performance and greatly simplify the task of
 * implementing new escapers. It is strongly recommended that when implementing a new escaper you
 * extend one of these classes. If you find that you are unable to achieve the desired behavior

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): if we start to override indexOf/lastIndexOf under GWT, we'll want some way to
   * override subList to return an ImmutableSortedAsList for better performance. Right now, I'm not
   * sure there's any performance hit from our failure to override subListUnchecked under GWT
   */
  @Override
  ImmutableList<E> subListUnchecked(int fromIndex, int toIndex) {