*
   * <p><b>Note:</b> When implementing an escaper it is a good idea to override this method for
   * efficiency by inlining the implementation of {@link #nextEscapeIndex(CharSequence, int, int)}
   * directly. Doing this for {@link com.google.common.net.PercentEscaper} more than doubled the
   * performance for unescaped strings (as measured by {@code CharEscapersBenchmark}).
   *

      }
    }
    if (cp >= safeMin && cp <= safeMax) {
      return null;
    }
    return escapeUnsafe(cp);
  }

  /* Overridden for performance. */
  @Override
  protected final int nextEscapeIndex(CharSequence csq, int index, int end) {
    while (index < end) {
      char c = csq.charAt(index);
      if ((c < replacementsLength && replacements[c] != null)
          || c > safeMaxChar

          }
          // Inefficient implementation that defines all letters as escapable.
          @Override
          protected int nextEscapeIndex(CharSequence csq, int index, int end) {
            while (index < end && !Character.isLetter(csq.charAt(index))) {
              index++;
            }
            return index;
          }
        };

          }
          // Inefficient implementation that defines all letters as escapable.
          @Override
          protected int nextEscapeIndex(CharSequence csq, int index, int end) {
            while (index < end && !Character.isLetter(csq.charAt(index))) {
              index++;
            }
            return index;
          }
        };

  /*
   * Overridden for performance. For unescaped strings this improved the performance of the uri
   * escaper from ~760ns to ~400ns as measured by {@link CharEscapersBenchmark}.
   */
  @Override
  protected int nextEscapeIndex(CharSequence csq, int index, int end) {
    checkNotNull(csq);
    for (; index < end; index++) {
      char c = csq.charAt(index);
      if (c >= safeOctets.length || !safeOctets[c]) {
        break;
      }