*
   * @param runnable the runnable task
   * @param result the result to return on successful completion. If you don't need a particular
   *     result, consider using constructions of the form: {@code ListenableFuture<?> f =
   *     ListenableFutureTask.create(runnable, null)}
   * @since 10.0
   */
  public static <V extends @Nullable Object> ListenableFutureTask<V> create(

   *
   * @param runnable the runnable task
   * @param result the result to return on successful completion. If you don't need a particular
   *     result, consider using constructions of the form: {@code ListenableFuture<?> f =
   *     ListenableFutureTask.create(runnable, null)}
   * @since 10.0
   */
  public static <V extends @Nullable Object> ListenableFutureTask<V> create(

   *
   * @param runnable the runnable task
   * @param result the result to return on successful completion. If you don't need a particular
   *     result, consider using constructions of the form: {@code ListenableFuture<?> f =
   *     ListenableFutureTask.create(runnable, null)}
   */
  static <V extends @Nullable Object> TrustedListenableFutureTask<V> create(

            assertEquals(128, new NdrShort(-128).value); // -128 & 0xFF = 128
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should maintain value consistency after multiple constructions")
        void testValueConsistency() {
            // Given: Same input value
            int inputValue = 1000;
            int expectedMasked = inputValue & 0xFF; // 232

     * empty at any point. (The sum ensures accuracy up through at least 1<<31 per-segment
     * modifications before recheck.)  Method containsValue() uses similar constructions for
     * stability checks.
     */
    long sum = 0L;
    Segment<K, V, E, S>[] segments = this.segments;
    for (int i = 0; i < segments.length; ++i) {
      if (segments[i].count != 0) {

        assertNotNull(ex.toString(), "toString should be non-null");
        ex.getMessage(); // don't assert content to avoid implementation assumptions

        // Verify no interactions happened with the mocked cause during construction/access
        verifyNoInteractions(mockCause);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Cause-only constructor with null: null cause maintained")
    void causeOnlyConstructor_acceptsNull() {
        // Arrange & Act

        return Stream.of(Arguments.of((String) null), Arguments.of(""));
    }

    /**
     * Validate message+cause constructor and that no interaction with cause occurs during construction.
     */
    @Test
    @DisplayName("String+Throwable ctor: sets message, cause and unsuccessful status")
    void messageAndCauseConstructor_setsFields(@Mock Throwable mockCause) {
        // Arrange

        // Act & Assert
        assertThrows(NullPointerException.class, () -> handler.openConnection(null), "Null URL should throw NPE");
        verify(mockCtx, never()).getConfig(); // no interaction expected on failure before construction
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("openConnection uses SingletonContext when no context provided")
    void testOpenConnection_UsesSingletonContext() throws Exception {
        // Arrange

    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Invalid constructor inputs")
    class InvalidInputs {
        @Test
        @DisplayName("Null delegate causes NullPointerException during construction")
        void nullDelegate_throwsNPE() throws Exception {
            SmbFile parent = newParent();
            assertThrows(NullPointerException.class, () -> new ShareEnumIterator(parent, null, null));
        }

   * that accepts zero or more arguments, all of type {@code String} or {@code Throwable}
   * (preferring constructors with at least one {@code String}, then preferring constructors with at
   * least one {@code Throwable}) and calling the constructor via reflection. If the exception did