public void testPutAllNullValueSingle_unsupported() {
    multimap().putAll(k1(), Lists.newArrayList((V) null));
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  // In principle, it would be nice to apply these two tests to keys with existing values, too.

  @MapFeature.Require(value = SUPPORTS_PUT, absent = ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES)
  public void testPutAllNullValueNullLast_unsupported() {

   *     intersection
   * @since 27.0
   */
  public Range<C> gap(Range<C> otherRange) {
    /*
     * For an explanation of the basic principle behind this check, see
     * https://stackoverflow.com/a/35754308/28465
     *
     * In that explanation's notation, our `overlap` check would be `x1 < y2 && y1 < x2`. We've

  public void testPutAllNullValueSingle_unsupported() {
    multimap().putAll(k1(), Lists.newArrayList((V) null));
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  // In principle, it would be nice to apply these two tests to keys with existing values, too.

  @MapFeature.Require(value = SUPPORTS_PUT, absent = ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES)
  public void testPutAllNullValueNullLast_unsupported() {

   *
   * However, for a variety of reasons, Google developers have written a ton of code over the past
   * decade that assumes that they can use checkNotNull for non-precondition checks. I had hoped to
   * take a principled stand on this, but the amount of such code is simply overwhelming. To avoid
   * creating a lot of compile errors that users would not find to be informative, we're giving in

 * https://github.com/google/guava/releases/tag/v27.0) This means that the copy of ListenableFuture
 * in com.google.guava:guava differs from the "frozen" copy in the listenablefuture artifact. This
 * could in principle cause problems for some users. Still, we expect that the benefits of the
 * nullness annotations in particular will outweigh the costs. (And it's worth noting that we have

  // Test suppression

  private final Set<Method> suppressedTests = new HashSet<>();

  /**
   * Prevents the given methods from being run as part of the test suite.
   *
   * <p>Note: in principle this should never need to be used, but it might be useful if the
   * semantics of an implementation disagree in unforeseen ways with the semantics expected by a

    elementsPlus.add(AFTER_LAST_2);
    return Ordering.explicit(Lists.newArrayList(elementsPlus));
  }

  /*
   * All the ContiguousSet generators below manually reject nulls here. In principle, we'd like to
   * defer that to Range, since it's ContiguousSet.create() that's used to create the sets. However,
   * that gets messy here, and we already have null tests for Range.
   */

  /*

 * https://github.com/google/guava/releases/tag/v27.0) This means that the copy of ListenableFuture
 * in com.google.guava:guava differs from the "frozen" copy in the listenablefuture artifact. This
 * could in principle cause problems for some users. Still, we expect that the benefits of the
 * nullness annotations in particular will outweigh the costs. (And it's worth noting that we have

   *       RuntimeException} (though {@code get} implementations are discouraged from throwing such
   *       exceptions).
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>The overall principle is to continue to treat every checked exception as a checked
   * exception, every unchecked exception as an unchecked exception, and every error as an error. In

            <signature>
              <groupId>com.toasttab.android</groupId>
              <artifactId>gummy-bears-api-19</artifactId>
              <version>0.6.1</version>
              <!-- TODO(cpovirk): In principle, it would make sense to *also* test compatibility with JDK 1.8, since guava-android also has JRE users. -->
            </signature>
            <ignores>