Guillaume Nodet <******@****.***> 1729859506 +0200

        .addEqualityGroup(
            RemovalNotification.create("one", 1, RemovalCause.EXPLICIT),
            RemovalNotification.create("one", 1, RemovalCause.REPLACED))
        .addEqualityGroup(RemovalNotification.create("1", 1, RemovalCause.EXPLICIT))
        .addEqualityGroup(RemovalNotification.create("one", 2, RemovalCause.EXPLICIT))
        .testEquals();
  }

   *     accepts a cause: Users of this class typically expect for instances to have a non-null
   *     cause. At the moment, you can <i>usually</i> still preserve behavior by passing an explicit
   *     {@code null} cause. Note, however, that passing an explicit {@code null} cause prevents
   *     anyone from calling {@link #initCause} later, so it is not quite equivalent to using a
   *     constructor that omits the cause.
   */
  @Deprecated

        .addEqualityGroup(
            RemovalNotification.create("one", 1, RemovalCause.EXPLICIT),
            RemovalNotification.create("one", 1, RemovalCause.REPLACED))
        .addEqualityGroup(RemovalNotification.create("1", 1, RemovalCause.EXPLICIT))
        .addEqualityGroup(RemovalNotification.create("one", 2, RemovalCause.EXPLICIT))
        .testEquals();
  }

   *     of this class typically expect for instances to have a non-null cause. At the moment, you
   *     can <i>usually</i> still preserve behavior by passing an explicit {@code null} cause. Note,
   *     however, that passing an explicit {@code null} cause prevents anyone from calling {@link
   *     #initCause} later, so it is not quite equivalent to using a constructor that omits the
   *     cause.
   */
  @Deprecated

   *     of this class typically expect for instances to have a non-null cause. At the moment, you
   *     can <i>usually</i> still preserve behavior by passing an explicit {@code null} cause. Note,
   *     however, that passing an explicit {@code null} cause prevents anyone from calling {@link
   *     #initCause} later, so it is not quite equivalent to using a constructor that omits the
   *     cause.
   */
  @Deprecated

    assert response.json() == "foo"


def test_required_nonable_explicit_query_invalid():
    response = client.get("/explicit-query")
    assert response.status_code == 422


def test_required_nonable_explicit_query_value():
    response = client.get("/explicit-query", params={"q": "foo"})
    assert response.status_code == 200
    assert response.json() == "foo"

// type of AbstractTensor in their context (do not pass an MlirTensor to a
// GraphContext and vice-versa).
class TracingTensorHandle : public AbstractTensorHandle {
 protected:
  explicit TracingTensorHandle(AbstractTensorHandleKind kind)
      : AbstractTensorHandle(kind) {}

 public:
  // For LLVM style RTTI.
  static bool classof(const AbstractTensorHandle* ptr) {

    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(c, Ordering.explicit(42, 5))
        .addEqualityGroup(Ordering.explicit(5, 42))
        .addEqualityGroup(Ordering.explicit(42))
        .testEquals();
    reserializeAndAssert(c);
  }

  public void testExplicit_sortingExample() {
    Comparator<Integer> c = Ordering.explicit(2, 8, 6, 1, 7, 5, 3, 4, 0, 9);
    List<Integer> list = asList(0, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9);

    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(c, Ordering.explicit(42, 5))
        .addEqualityGroup(Ordering.explicit(5, 42))
        .addEqualityGroup(Ordering.explicit(42))
        .testEquals();
    reserializeAndAssert(c);
  }

  public void testExplicit_sortingExample() {
    Comparator<Integer> c = Ordering.explicit(2, 8, 6, 1, 7, 5, 3, 4, 0, 9);
    List<Integer> list = asList(0, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9);