h = remix(h);
      buf[bufLen++] = getChar(h);

      int x0 = buf[bufLen - 1] & 0xff;
      int x1 = buf[bufLen - 2] & 0xff;
      int x2 = buf[bufLen - 3] & 0xff;
      int x3 = buf[bufLen / 2] & 0xff;
      buf[((x0 << 16) + (x1 << 8) + x2) % bufLen] ^= x3;
      buf[((x1 << 16) + (x2 << 8) + x3) % bufLen] ^= i % 256;
    }
    assertEquals(0x7a1d67c50ec7e167L, h);
  }

     * 1.0.0.RC1 < 1.0.0-RC2 and more generally:
     * 1.0.0.X1 < 1.0.0-X2 for any string X
     */
    @Test
    void testMng7644() {
        for (String x : new String[] {"abc", "alpha", "a", "beta", "b", "def", "milestone", "m", "RC"}) {
            // 1.0.0.X1 < 1.0.0-X2 for any string x
            checkVersionsOrder("1.0.0." + x + "1", "1.0.0-" + x + "2");

 *   {@code 1.0.RC2 < 1.0-RC3 < 1.0.1}; but prefer {@code 1.0.0-RC1} over {@code 1.0.0.RC1}, and more
 *   generally: {@code 1.0.X2 < 1.0-X3 < 1.0.1} for any string {@code X}; but prefer {@code 1.0.0-X1}
 *   over {@code 1.0.0.X1}.</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * @see <a href="https://maven.apache.org/pom.html#version-order-specification">"Versioning" in the POM reference</a>
 */

      h = remix(h);
      buf[bufLen++] = getChar(h);

      int x0 = buf[bufLen - 1] & 0xff;
      int x1 = buf[bufLen - 2] & 0xff;
      int x2 = buf[bufLen - 3] & 0xff;
      int x3 = buf[bufLen / 2] & 0xff;
      buf[((x0 << 16) + (x1 << 8) + x2) % bufLen] ^= x3;
      buf[((x1 << 16) + (x2 << 8) + x3) % bufLen] ^= i % 256;
    }
    assertEquals(0x7a1d67c50ec7e167L, h);
  }

      h = remix(h);
      buf[bufLen++] = getChar(h);

      int x0 = buf[bufLen - 1] & 0xff;
      int x1 = buf[bufLen - 2] & 0xff;
      int x2 = buf[bufLen - 3] & 0xff;
      int x3 = buf[bufLen / 2] & 0xff;
      buf[((x0 << 16) + (x1 << 8) + x2) % bufLen] ^= x3;
      buf[((x1 << 16) + (x2 << 8) + x3) % bufLen] ^= i % 256;
    }
    assertEquals(0xeaa3b1c985261632L, h);
  }

// in the usual way by the opcode itself. Asm must use AMRC for both instructions, so
// we return the opcode for MRC so that asm doesn't need to import obj/arm.
func ARMMRCOffset(op obj.As, cond string, x0, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5 int64) (offset int64, op0 obj.As, ok bool) {
	op1 := int64(0)
	if op == arm.AMRC {
		op1 = 1
	}
	bits, ok := ParseARMCondition(cond)
	if !ok {
		return
	}

   *     null}.
   */
  @Deprecated
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // propagateIfInstanceOf
  public static <X1 extends Throwable, X2 extends Throwable> void propagateIfPossible(
      @CheckForNull Throwable throwable, Class<X1> declaredType1, Class<X2> declaredType2)
      throws X1, X2 {
    checkNotNull(declaredType2);
    propagateIfInstanceOf(throwable, declaredType1);

			x0 := p.getConstant(prog, op, &a[0])
			x1 := p.getConstant(prog, op, &a[1])
			x2 := int64(p.getRegister(prog, op, &a[2]))
			x3 := int64(p.getRegister(prog, op, &a[3]))
			x4 := int64(p.getRegister(prog, op, &a[4]))
			x5 := p.getConstant(prog, op, &a[5])
			// Cond is handled specially for this instruction.
			offset, MRC, ok := arch.ARMMRCOffset(op, cond, x0, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)
			if !ok {

    /*
     * For an explanation of the basic principle behind this check, see
     * https://stackoverflow.com/a/35754308/28465
     *
     * In that explanation's notation, our `overlap` check would be `x1 < y2 && y1 < x2`. We've
     * flipped one part of the check so that we're using "less than" in both cases (rather than a
     * mix of "less than" and "greater than"). We've also switched to "strictly less than" rather

    /*
     * For an explanation of the basic principle behind this check, see
     * https://stackoverflow.com/a/35754308/28465
     *
     * In that explanation's notation, our `overlap` check would be `x1 < y2 && y1 < x2`. We've
     * flipped one part of the check so that we're using "less than" in both cases (rather than a
     * mix of "less than" and "greater than"). We've also switched to "strictly less than" rather