- Reference related issues (e.g., “Closes #1234”).
   - Notify team members via GitHub `@mentions` if urgent or complex.

## Reviewing PRs

Reviewers ensure MinIO’s commit history remains a clear, reliable record. Responsibilities include:

1. **Commit Quality**:
   - Verify each commit explains *why* the change was made (e.g., “So that…”).

					if len(l.lockUID) == locks*readers {
						t.Fatalf("objects uids all remain, unlikely")
					}
					if len(l.lockMap) == 0 {
						t.Fatalf("objects all deleted, 0 remains")
					}
					if len(l.lockUID) == 0 {
						t.Fatalf("objects uids all deleted, 0 remains")
					}

					start = time.Now()
					l.expireOldLocks(-time.Minute)

    String jacksons = "arfo(Marlon)aorf, (Michael)orfa, afro(Jackie)orfa, ofar(Jemaine), aff(Tito)";
    Iterable<String> family =
        COMMA_SPLITTER
            .trimResults(CharMatcher.anyOf("afro").or(CharMatcher.whitespace()))
            .split(jacksons);
    assertThat(family)
        .containsExactly("(Marlon)", "(Michael)", "(Jackie)", "(Jemaine)", "(Tito)")
        .inOrder();
  }

        // Assert
        assertSame(mocked, ex.getCause(), "Mocked cause should be preserved");
        verifyNoInteractions(mocked);
    }

    // Reflection-based check: ensure serialVersionUID remains the declared constant
    @Test
    @DisplayName("serialVersionUID matches declared constant")
    void serialVersionUID_hasExpectedValue() throws Exception {
        // Arrange

        // Session starts with usage count > 0, so acquire/release cycles maintain usage
        assertTrue(session.isInUse(), "Session should be in use initially");

        // Test acquire/release cycles (session remains in use due to initial transport acquire)
        for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
            session.acquire();
            assertTrue(session.isInUse(), "Session should be in use after acquire " + i);

    withContext(Dispatchers.IO) {
      fileSystem.write(outputFile) {
        importResults.writeOut(this)
      }
    }

  /**
   * These assertions ensure the [PublicSuffixDatabase] remains correct. The specification is
   * very flexible regarding wildcard rules, but this flexibility is not something currently used
   * in practice. To simplify the implementation, we've avoided implementing the flexible rules in

    void lookup_returns_empty_for_unknown_codes(int unknownCode) {
        // Invalid inputs: codes not present should yield no message
        // Guard to ensure test remains valid if constants change in future
        for (int c : WinError.WINERR_CODES) {
            assertNotEquals(unknownCode, c, "Chosen unknown code unexpectedly clashes with a known code");
        }

        request.addHeader("Host", "example.com");
        result = virtualHostHelper.getVirtualHostPath(page);
        assertEquals("/site1/search", result.getRoutingPath());

        // The header remains for subsequent tests due to static request handling
        // Different matching header added to same request
        request.addHeader("X-Forwarded-Host", "test.com");
        result = virtualHostHelper.getVirtualHostPath(page);

        auth.handle(new Callback[] { nc, pc });

        // With empty strings for username and domain, results in "@"
        assertEquals("@", nc.getName());
        // Password is null, so callback is not set (remains null)
        assertNull(pc.getPassword());
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("handle: null password leaves PasswordCallback unset")
    void testHandleWithNullPasswordDoesNotSet() throws Exception {

useful?

Erasure code protects data from multiple drives failure, unlike RAID or replication. For example, RAID6 can protect against two drive failure whereas in MinIO erasure code you can lose as many as half of drives and still the data remains safe. Further, MinIO's erasure code is at the object level and can heal one object at a time. For RAID, healing can be done only at the volume level which translates into high downtime. As MinIO encodes each object individually, it can heal objects...