}{
		{
			name: "valid resource ID must succeed",
			args: args{
				resourceID:   "my-role",
				serverRegion: "us-east-1",
			},
			want: ARN{
				Partition:    "minio",
				Service:      "iam",
				Region:       "us-east-1",
				ResourceType: "role",
				ResourceID:   "my-role",
			},
			wantErr: false,
		},
		{
			name: "valid resource ID must succeed",
			args: args{
				resourceID:   "-my-role",

    server.enqueue(
      MockResponse.Builder()
        .body("abc")
        .addHeader("Content-Type: text/plain")
        .build(),
    )

    // Make a request from client to server. It should succeed certificate checks (unfortunately the
    // rogue CA is trusted) but it should fail certificate pinning.
    val request =
      Request.Builder()
        .url(server.url("/"))
        .build()

```sh
# 1. Create a bucket and a user, and upload a file. These operations will succeed.
mc mb myminio/test
mc admin user add myminio foo foobar123
mc cp /etc/issue myminio/test/

# 2. Now access the server as user `foo`. These operations will also succeed.
export MC_HOST_foo=http://foo:foobar123@localhost:9000
mc ls foo/test
mc cat foo/test/issue

      long oldValue = atomic.get();
      if (oldValue == 0L || atomic.compareAndSet(oldValue, 0L)) {
        // only remove after setting to zero, to avoid concurrent updates
        map.remove(key, atomic);
        // succeed even if the remove fails, since the value was already adjusted
        return oldValue;
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * If {@code (key, value)} is currently in the map, this method removes it and returns true;

	n, err := w.Write([]byte("abcd"))
	w.Close()
	if err != nil {
		t.Errorf("DeadlineWriter should succeed but failed with %s", err)
	}
	if n != 4 {
		t.Errorf("DeadlineWriter should succeed but should have only written 4 bytes, but returned %d instead", n)
	}
}

func TestCloseOnWriter(t *testing.T) {
	writer := WriteOnClose(io.Discard)
	if writer.HasWritten() {

		"--name",
		"valid-name",
	})).Should(Succeed())
	g.Expect(o.prepare(ctx)).Should(Succeed())

	o = RemoteSecretOptions{}
	flags = pflag.NewFlagSet("test", pflag.ContinueOnError)
	o.addFlags(flags)
	g.Expect(flags.Parse([]string{
		"--name",
		"?-invalid-name",
	})).Should(Succeed())
	g.Expect(o.prepare(ctx)).Should(Not(Succeed()))

    SettableFuture<String> future = SettableFuture.create();
    future.set(RESULT);
    /*
     * getUninterruptibly should call the timed get method once with a
     * wait of 0 seconds (and it should succeed, since the result is already
     * available).
     */
    assertEquals(RESULT, getUninterruptibly(future, 0, SECONDS));
  }

  public void testMakeUninterruptible_timedGetNegativeTimeoutAttempted()

	}
	gr, err := obj.GetObjectNInfo(ctx, bucket, object, nil, nil, ObjectOptions{})
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("Expected GetObject to succeed, but failed with %v", err)
	}
	output := bytes.NewBuffer([]byte{})
	_, err = io.Copy(output, gr)
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("Expected GetObject reading data to succeed, but failed with %v", err)
	}
	gr.Close()
	if !bytes.Equal(output.Bytes(), smallData) {
		t.Fatalf("Corrupted data is found")

		t.Run(testCase.s, func(t *testing.T) {
			endpoints, secure, err := parseEndpoints(testCase.s)
			if err != nil && testCase.success {
				t.Errorf("expected to succeed but failed with %s", err)
			}
			if !testCase.success && err == nil {
				t.Error("expected failure but succeeded instead")
			}
			if testCase.success {
				if !reflect.DeepEqual(endpoints, testCase.endpoints) {
					t.Errorf("expected %s, got %s", testCase.endpoints, endpoints)

A visible effect of this change is that `len` and `cap` of timer channels
now returns 0 instead of 1, which may affect programs that
poll the length to decide whether a receive on the timer channel
will succeed.
Such code should use a non-blocking receive instead.

These new behaviors are only enabled when the main Go program
is in a module with a `go.mod` `go` line using Go 1.23.0 or later.