In GitHub, the template will guide you to write the right question so that you can more easily get a good answer, or even solve the problem yourself even before asking. And in GitHub I can make sure I always answer everything, even if it takes some time. I can't personally do that with the chat systems. 😅

          assertEquals(list.lastIndexOf(key), answer);
          return;
        }
        break;
      case ANY_PRESENT:
        if (list.contains(key)) {
          assertEquals(key, list.get(answer));
          return;
        }
        break;
      case FIRST_AFTER:
        if (list.contains(key)) {
          assertEquals(list.lastIndexOf(key) + 1, answer);
          return;
        }
        break;
      case LAST_BEFORE:

    }

    @Test
    void testReadByte() throws SmbException {
        // Mock the read operation to return a specific byte
        doAnswer(new Answer<Void>() {
            @Override
            public Void answer(InvocationOnMock invocation) throws Throwable {
                SmbComReadAndX readCmd = invocation.getArgument(0);
                SmbComReadAndXResponse response = invocation.getArgument(1);

#### The time to answer helps the attackers { #the-time-to-answer-helps-the-attackers }

        -----END CERTIFICATE-----
        """.trimIndent().decodeCertificatePem()

      val handshakeCertificates =
        HandshakeCertificates
          .Builder()
          // TODO reenable in official answers
//      .addPlatformTrustedCertificates()
          .addTrustedCertificate(cert)
          .build()

      clientBuilder
        .sslSocketFactory(
          handshakeCertificates.sslSocketFactory(),

    @Mock
    private DcerpcHandle mockDcerpcHandle;

    // Mocking MsrpcLsarOpenPolicy2 and MsrpcLsarClose is tricky because they are created inside the constructor/method.
    // We need to use ArgumentCaptor or a custom Answer to control their behavior.
    // For now, let's assume we can mock their behavior through the sendrecv method of DcerpcHandle.

    @BeforeEach
    void setUp() {

Зная это, Python может пока переключиться на выполнение других задач 🔀 ⏯
(например получение следующего запроса).<!--http://new.gramota.ru/spravka/buro/search-answer?s=296614-->

Чтобы ключевое слово `await` сработало, оно должно находиться внутри функции,
которая поддерживает асинхронность. Для этого вам просто нужно объявить её как `async def`:

```Python hl_lines="1"

  }

  /**
   * This test creates a long random sequence of inputs, then a lot of differently configured sinks
   * process it; all should produce the same answer, the only difference should be the number of
   * process()/processRemaining() invocations, due to alignment.
   */
  @AndroidIncompatible // slow. TODO(cpovirk): Maybe just reduce iterations under Android.

  }

  /**
   * This test creates a long random sequence of inputs, then a lot of differently configured sinks
   * process it; all should produce the same answer, the only difference should be the number of
   * process()/processRemaining() invocations, due to alignment.
   */
  @AndroidIncompatible // slow. TODO(cpovirk): Maybe just reduce iterations under Android.

        batches.add(new String[] { "c" }); // second batch
        batches.add(new String[] {}); // last -> NO_MORE_FILES

        // send() answer that mutates the provided response
        when(tree.send(any(Trans2FindFirst2.class), any(Trans2FindFirst2Response.class))).thenAnswer((InvocationOnMock inv) -> {
            Trans2FindFirst2Response resp = inv.getArgument(1);