# Return some error
    ...
```

But by using the `secrets.compare_digest()` it will be secure against a type of attacks called "timing attacks".

### Timing Attacks

But what's a "timing attack"?

Let's imagine some attackers are trying to guess the username and password.

And they send a request with a username `johndoe` and a password `love123`.

    # Einen Error zurückgeben
    ...
```

Aber durch die Verwendung von `secrets.compare_digest()` ist dieser Code sicher vor einer Art von Angriffen, die „Timing-Angriffe“ genannt werden.

### Timing-Angriffe

Aber was ist ein „Timing-Angriff“?

Stellen wir uns vor, dass einige Angreifer versuchen, den Benutzernamen und das Passwort zu erraten.

    # Return some error
    ...
```

Porém, ao utilizar o `secrets.compare_digest()`, isso estará seguro contra um tipo de ataque chamado "timing attacks" (ataques de temporização).

### Ataques de Temporização

Mas o que é um "timing attack" (ataque de temporização)?

Vamos imaginar que alguns invasores estão tentando adivinhar o usuário e a senha.

      slowFactorials[i] = RANDOM_SOURCE.nextInt(factorialBound);
      binomials[i] = RANDOM_SOURCE.nextInt(factorials[i] + 1);
    }
  }

  /** Previous version of BigIntegerMath.factorial, kept for timing purposes. */
  private static BigInteger oldSlowFactorial(int n) {
    if (n <= 20) {
      return BigInteger.valueOf(LongMath.factorial(n));
    } else {
      int k = 20;

      slowFactorials[i] = RANDOM_SOURCE.nextInt(factorialBound);
      binomials[i] = RANDOM_SOURCE.nextInt(factorials[i] + 1);
    }
  }

  /** Previous version of BigIntegerMath.factorial, kept for timing purposes. */
  private static BigInteger oldSlowFactorial(int n) {
    if (n <= 20) {
      return BigInteger.valueOf(LongMath.factorial(n));
    } else {
      int k = 20;

	return locked
}

const (
	lockRetryInterval = 50 * time.Millisecond
)

// lockLoop will acquire either a read or a write lock
//
// The call will block until the lock is granted using a built-in
// timing randomized back-off algorithm to try again until successful
func (lm *LRWMutex) lockLoop(ctx context.Context, id, source string, timeout time.Duration, isWriteLock bool) (locked bool) {

          try {
            if (timer != null) {
              long overDelayMs = Math.abs(timer.getDelay(MILLISECONDS));
              if (overDelayMs > 10) { // Not all timing drift is worth reporting
                message += " (timeout delayed by " + overDelayMs + " ms after scheduled time)";
              }
            }
            message += ": " + delegate;
          } finally {

}

// Replacer replacer interface like strings.Replacer
type Replacer interface {
	Replace(name string) string
}

var _ Namer = (*NamingStrategy)(nil)

// NamingStrategy tables, columns naming strategy
type NamingStrategy struct {
	TablePrefix         string
	SingularTable       bool
	NameReplacer        Replacer
	NoLowerCase         bool
	IdentifierMaxLength int
}

# Erasure code sizing guide

## Toy Setups

Capacity constrained environments, MinIO will work but not recommended for production.

| servers | drives (per node) | stripe_size | parity chosen (default) | tolerance for reads (servers) | tolerance for writes (servers) |
|--------:|------------------:|------------:|------------------------:|------------------------------:|-------------------------------:|

name: Feature Addition Request
description: I want to add a new feature
labels: ["type=addition"]
body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Filing feature requests is one of the most popular ways to contribute to Guava.


        Be aware, though: most feature requests are not accepted, even if they're suggested by
        a full-time Guava team member. [Feedback](https://stackoverflow.com/a/4543114) from our