for _, c := range globalPublicCerts {
			check := xxh3.Hash(c.RawIssuer)
			check ^= xxh3.Hash(c.RawSubjectPublicKeyInfo)
			// We XOR, so order doesn't matter.
			for _, v := range c.DNSNames {
				check ^= xxh3.HashString(v)
			}
			for _, v := range c.EmailAddresses {
				check ^= xxh3.HashString(v)
			}
			for _, v := range c.IPAddresses {
				check ^= xxh3.HashString(v.String())
			}

Das liegt daran, dass erwartet wird, dass **Ihre Benutzer** den tatsächlichen **URL-Pfad**, an dem sie den Webhook-Request empfangen möchten, auf andere Weise definieren (z. B. über ein Web-Dashboard).

### Die Dokumentation testen { #check-the-docs }

Jetzt können Sie Ihre App starten und auf <a href="http://127.0.0.1:8000/docs" class="external-link" target="_blank">http://127.0.0.1:8000/docs</a> gehen.

But when checking benchmarks and comparisons you should keep the following in mind.

## Benchmarks and speed { #benchmarks-and-speed }

When you check the benchmarks, it is common to see several tools of different types compared as equivalent.

Specifically, to see Uvicorn, Starlette and FastAPI compared together (among many other tools).

	# Wait for Status: in MinIO output
	while true; do
		rv=$(check_online)
		if [ "$rv" != "1" ]; then
			# success
			break
		fi

		# Check if we should retry
		retry=$((retry + 1))
		if [ $retry -le 20 ]; then
			sleep 5
			continue
		fi

		# Failure
		fail
	done

	if ! ps -p $pid1 1>&2 >/dev/null; then

```

</div>

## Es testen { #check-it }

Gehen Sie zu der interaktiven Dokumentation unter: <a href="http://127.0.0.1:8000/docs" class="external-link" target="_blank">http://127.0.0.1:8000/docs</a>.

Sie werden etwa Folgendes sehen:

<img src="/img/tutorial/security/image01.png">

/// check | Authorize-Button!

Sie haben bereits einen glänzenden, neuen „Authorize“-Button.

  @GwtIncompatible // threads
  public void testOverflowTimeout() throws Exception {
    // First, sanity check that naive multiplication would really overflow to a negative number:
    long nanosPerSecond = NANOSECONDS.convert(1, SECONDS);
    assertThat(nanosPerSecond * Long.MAX_VALUE).isLessThan(0L);

    // Check that we wait long enough anyway (presumably as long as MAX_VALUE nanos):

**FastAPI** **extraerá** los datos para **cada campo** de las **cookies** recibidas en el request y te entregará el modelo de Pydantic que definiste.

## Revisa la Documentación { #check-the-docs }

Puedes ver las cookies definidas en la UI de la documentación en `/docs`:

<div class="screenshot">
<img src="/img/tutorial/cookie-param-models/image01.png">
</div>

/// info | Información

	}

	// Get umask of the bits stored.
	currentUmask := 0o777 - uint32(st.Mode().Perm())

	// Verify if umask is correct.
	if int(currentUmask) != testCase.expectedUmask {
		t.Fatalf("Umask check failed expected %d, got %d", testCase.expectedUmask, currentUmask)
	}
}

// Tests if the file creations happen with proper umask.
func TestIsValidUmaskFile(t *testing.T) {
	tmpPath := t.TempDir()

	nowBlocking := make(chan struct{})
	remoteConn.debugMsg(debugBlockInboundMessages, nowBlocking)

	// Check that local returned.
	err = st.Results(func(b []byte) error {
		return nil
	})
	if err == nil {
		t.Fatal("expected error, got nil")
	}
	t.Logf("response: %v", err)

	// Check that remote is canceled.
	<-serverCanceled
	close(nowBlocking)
}

        || isEquals(member)
        /*
         * We can assume that Kotlin code is performing the null checks that we want, since kotlinc
         * inserts checks automatically for non-private functions (which are the only kind that we
         * check).
         *
         * We *would* just check such functions redundantly, but kotlinc emits its nullness