}

spotless {
  java {
    // IDEs can sometimes run annotation processors that leave files in
    // here, causing Spotless to complain. Even though this path ought not
    // to exist, exclude it anyway in order to avoid spurious failures.
    targetExclude 'src/main/generated/**/*.java'
  }

            defaultSubstitutions = commonDefaultSubstitutions
            testRoot.convention(restRootDir)
        }

        // TODO: This effectively makes testRoot not customizable, which we don't do anyway atm
        project.sourceSets.test.output.dir(restRootDir, builtBy: buildRestTests)
    }

    arraycopy(contents, 0, result, 0, contents.length);
    return result;
  }

  /*
   * a "type A" unmodifiable collection freaks out proactively, even if there
   * wasn't going to be any actual work to do anyway
   */

  @Override
  public boolean addAll(Collection<? extends E> elementsToAdd) {
    throw up();
  }

  @Override
  public boolean removeAll(Collection<?> elementsToRemove) {
    throw up();

   * "best effort" approach is taken; if {@code str} does not conform to the assumed format, then
   * the behavior of this method is undefined but we make a reasonable effort at converting anyway.
   */
  public final String to(CaseFormat format, String str) {
    checkNotNull(format);
    checkNotNull(str);
    return (format == this) ? str : convert(format, str);
  }

    assertThrows(UncheckedTimeoutException.class, () -> proxy.sleepThenReturnInput("x"));

    assertThat(stopwatch.elapsed(MILLISECONDS)).isIn(Range.closed(NOT_ENOUGH_MS, DELAY_MS * 2));
    // Is it still computing away anyway?
    assertThat(target.finished).isFalse();
    MILLISECONDS.sleep(ENOUGH_MS);
    assertThat(target.finished).isFalse();
  }

  public void testNewProxy_badMethodWithEnoughTime() throws Exception {

  }

  // Technically we should test other reentrant scenarios (4 combinations of
  // hasNext/next), but we'll cop out for now, knowing that
  // next() both start by invoking hasNext() anyway.

      } else {
        oldCell.merge(value, merger);
      }
    }

    /*
     * While the current implementation returns `this`, that's not something we mean to guarantee.
     * Anyway, the purpose of this method is to implement a BinaryOperator combiner for a Collector,
     * so its return value will get used naturally.
     */
    @SuppressWarnings("CanIgnoreReturnValueSuggester")

  }

  // Technically we should test other reentrant scenarios (9 combinations of
  // hasNext/next/peek), but we'll cop out for now, knowing that peek() and
  // next() both start by invoking hasNext() anyway.

  }

  // Technically we should test other reentrant scenarios (9 combinations of
  // hasNext/next/peek), but we'll cop out for now, knowing that peek() and
  // next() both start by invoking hasNext() anyway.

     * we can override it in our non-null-guaranteeing subtypes to present a better signature to
     * their users.
     *
     * However, the checker *we* use has this special knowledge about `Collection.toArray()` anyway,
     * so in our implementation code, we can rely on that. That's why the expression below
     * type-checks.
     */
    return super.toArray();
  }