// Create a mock RPC SID to simulate a domain SID
        rpc.sid_t rpcSid = new rpc.sid_t();
        rpcSid.revision = 1;
        rpcSid.sub_authority_count = 4; // Fixed: should be 4 to properly represent domain SID
        rpcSid.identifier_authority = new byte[] { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 5 };
        rpcSid.sub_authority = new int[] { 21, 123, 456, 789 };

        FileEntry fe3 = mock(FileEntry.class);
        lenient().when(fe3.getName()).thenReturn("file3");
        when(fe3.getFileIndex()).thenReturn(3);

        // Track query count to handle multiple queries properly
        final int[] queryCount = { 0 };

        // Mock send(create) to wire a query response with fe1, fe2
        doAnswer(inv -> {
            Object arg = inv.getArgument(0);

    @BeforeEach
    public void setUp() {
        MockitoAnnotations.openMocks(this);
    }

    @Test
    public void testConstructorInitializesFields() {
        // Test constructor initialization with proper expectations
        String pipeName = "\\\\pipe\\testPipe";
        TransWaitNamedPipe pipe = new TransWaitNamedPipe(pipeName);

        // Verify the name is set correctly
        assertEquals(pipeName, pipe.name);

  // Initializes context for the local worker and no contexts will be created
  // for remote workers. Currently this only works for resetting context.
  // TODO(b/289445025): Consider removing this when we find a proper fix.
  virtual absl::Status InitializeLocalOnlyContext(const ServerDef& server_def,
                                                  int keep_alive_secs) = 0;

 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive
 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *
 * <p>To use this class the concrete subclass must implement the {@link

 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive
 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *
 * <p>To use this class the concrete subclass must implement the {@link

        // Note: here, type decides is artifact added to "build path" (for example during resolution)
        // and "build path" is intermediate data that is used to create actual Java classpath/modulepath
        // but to create those, proper filtering should happen via Type properties.
    }

    @Override
    public void addHandlers(Map<String, ArtifactHandler> handlers) {

            assertSame(differentException, thrown);
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("list wraps non-SmbException CIFSException properly")
        void list_wrapsOtherCIFSException() throws Exception {
            // Arrange
            SmbFile parent = mock(SmbFile.class, RETURNS_DEEP_STUBS);

      logger
          .get()
          .log(
              Level.WARNING,
              "ServiceManager configured with no services.  Is your application configured"
                  + " properly?",
              new EmptyServiceManagerWarning());
      copy = ImmutableList.of(new NoOpService());
    }
    this.state = new ServiceManagerState(copy);
    this.services = copy;

            assertTrue(result instanceof DefaultQueryBuilder);
        }
    }

    @Test
    public void test_register() {
        // Test that register method properly registers the command with QueryProcessor
        BoostQueryCommand newCommand = new BoostQueryCommand();
        newCommand.register();

        // Create a test BoostQuery to verify registration