AbstractFuture<Object> testFuture3 = new AbstractFuture<Object>() {};
    testFuture3.setFuture(testFuture2);
    assertThat(testFuture3.toString())
        .matches(
            "[^\\[]+\\[status=PENDING, setFuture=\\[[^\\[]+\\[status=PENDING,"
                + " info=\\[cause=\\[Someday...]]]]]");
    testFuture2.set("result string");
    assertThat(testFuture3.toString())

 * worst case time complexity of O(N^2). You are extremely unlikely to hit this quadratic case on
 * randomly ordered data (the probability decreases faster than exponentially in N), but if you are
 * passing in unsanitized user data then a malicious user could force it. A light shuffle of the
 * data using an unpredictable seed should normally be enough to thwart this attack.
 *

  //
  // The CSI driver specifies podInfoOnMount as part of driver deployment.
  // If true, Kubelet will pass pod information as VolumeContext in the CSI NodePublishVolume() calls.
  // The CSI driver is responsible for parsing and validating the information passed in as VolumeContext.
  //
  // The following VolumeConext will be passed if podInfoOnMount is set to true.
  // This list might grow, but the prefix will be used.

	set := s.getHashedSet(object)
	return set.AbortMultipartUpload(ctx, bucket, object, uploadID, opts)
}

// CompleteMultipartUpload - completes a pending multipart transaction, on hashedSet based on object name.

        /*
         * lowasser, 2015-Feb-12: Benchmarks suggest that changing this to UnsignedLongs.remainder
         * and increasing the threshold to 2^32 doesn't pay for itself, and adding another enum
         * constant hurts performance further -- I suspect because bimorphic implementation is a
         * sweet spot for the JVM.
         */
        return (a * b) % m;
      }

user if it does not exist if ! checkUserExists $USER ; then echo "Creating user '$USER'" ${MC} admin user add myminio $USER $PASS else echo "User '$USER' already exists." fi # set policy for user if [ ! -z $POLICY -a $POLICY != " " ] ; then echo "Adding policy '$POLICY' for '$USER'" ${MC} admin policy set myminio $POLICY user=$USER else echo "User '$USER' has no policy attached." fi } # Try connecting to MinIO instance {{- if .Values.tls.enabled }} scheme=https {{- else }} scheme=http {{- end }}...

	}
}

func (z *erasureServerPools) decommissionInBackground(ctx context.Context, idx int) error {
	pool := z.serverPools[idx]
	z.poolMetaMutex.RLock()
	pending := z.poolMeta.PendingBuckets(idx)
	z.poolMetaMutex.RUnlock()

	for _, bucket := range pending {
		z.poolMetaMutex.RLock()
		isDecommissioned := z.poolMeta.isBucketDecommissioned(idx, bucket.String())
		z.poolMetaMutex.RUnlock()
		if isDecommissioned {

  optional int32 desiredNumberScheduled = 3;

  // Total number of nodes that should be running the daemon pod and have one
  // or more of the daemon pod running with a Ready Condition by passing the readinessProbe.
  optional int32 numberReady = 4;

  // The most recent generation observed by the daemon set controller.
  // +optional
  optional int64 observedGeneration = 5;

          latch.countDown()
        }
      },
    )
    latch.await()
    // There's some flakiness when triggering a GC for objects in a separate thread. Adding a
    // small delay appears to ensure the objects will get GC'd.
    Thread.sleep(200)
    awaitGarbageCollection()
    val message = testLogHandler.take()
    assertThat(message).contains(

  public static <E extends @Nullable Object> CopyOnWriteArraySet<E> newCopyOnWriteArraySet(
      Iterable<? extends E> elements) {
    // We copy elements to an ArrayList first, rather than incurring the
    // quadratic cost of adding them to the COWAS directly.
    Collection<? extends E> elementsCollection =
        (elements instanceof Collection)
            ? (Collection<? extends E>) elements
            : Lists.newArrayList(elements);