import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Utilities for benchmarks.
 *
 * <p>In many cases, we wish to vary the order of magnitude of the input as much as we want to vary
 * the input itself, so most methods which generate values use an exponential distribution varying
 * the order of magnitude of the generated values uniformly at random.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@NullUnmarked
final class MathBenchmarking {

    @Mock
    private NdrObject mockNdrObject;

    private MsrpcQueryInformationPolicy queryPolicy;

    @BeforeEach
    void setUp() {
        // Setup is done through individual test methods
    }

    @Test
    void constructor_shouldInitializeWithValidParameters() {
        // Arrange
        short level = 3;

        // Act

 * java.util.concurrent.atomic} package specification for description of the properties of atomic
 * variables.
 *
 * <p><a id="bitEquals"></a>This class compares primitive {@code double} values in methods such as
 * {@link #compareAndSet} by comparing their bitwise representation using {@link
 * Double#doubleToRawLongBits}, which differs from both the primitive double {@code ==} operator and

  public EquivalenceTester<T> addEquivalenceGroup(Iterable<T> group) {
    delegate.addRelatedGroup(group);
    items.addAll(ImmutableList.copyOf(group));
    return this;
  }

  /** Run tests on equivalence methods, throwing a failure on an invalid test */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public EquivalenceTester<T> test() {
    for (int run = 0; run < REPETITIONS; run++) {
      testItems();
      delegate.test();
    }

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Utilities for benchmarks.
 *
 * <p>In many cases, we wish to vary the order of magnitude of the input as much as we want to vary
 * the input itself, so most methods which generate values use an exponential distribution varying
 * the order of magnitude of the generated values uniformly at random.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@NullUnmarked
final class MathBenchmarking {

    } finally {
      interruptenator.shutdown();
      Thread.interrupted();
    }
  }

  /**
   * awaitFullGc() is not quite as reliable a way to ensure calling of a specific finalize method as
   * the more direct await* methods, but should be reliable enough in practice to avoid flakiness of
   * this test. (And if it isn't, we'd like to know about it first!)
   */
  public void testAwaitFullGc() {

  }

  /**
   * This test checks an implementation dependent feature. It tests that the method {@code addEdge}
   * will silently add the missing nodes to the graph, then add the edge connecting them. We are not
   * using the proxy methods here as we want to test {@code addEdge} when the end-points are not
   * elements of the graph.
   */
  @Test

  }

  /**
   * This test checks an implementation dependent feature. It tests that the method {@code addEdge}
   * will silently add the missing nodes to the graph, then add the edge connecting them. We are not
   * using the proxy methods here as we want to test {@code addEdge} when the end-points are not
   * elements of the graph.
   */
  @Test

  protected AbstractExecutionThreadService() {}

  /**
   * Start the service. This method is invoked on the execution thread.
   *
   * <p>By default this method does nothing.
   */
  protected void startUp() throws Exception {}

  /**
   * Run the service. This method is invoked on the execution thread. Implementations must respond

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;

/**
 * Tests serialization and deserialization of an object, optionally asserting that the resulting
 * object is equal to the original.
 *
 * <p><b>GWT warning:</b> Under GWT, both methods simply returns their input, as proper GWT
 * serialization tests require more setup. This no-op behavior allows test authors to intersperse
 * {@code SerializableTester} calls with other, GWT-compatible tests.
 *