* Otherwise, at least reduce <i>explicit</i> dependencies on this type by using lambda expressions
 * or method references instead of classes, leaving your code easier to migrate in the future.
 *
 * <p>To use an existing supplier instance (say, named {@code supplier}) in a context where the
 * <i>other type</i> of supplier is expected, use the method reference {@code supplier::get}. A

       * Static final fields are presumed to be fastest, based on our experience with
       * UnsignedBytesBenchmark. TODO(cpovirk): benchmark this
       */
      /*
       * A CopyOnWriteArraySet<WeakReference> is faster than a newSetFromMap of a MapMaker map with
       * weakKeys() and concurrencyLevel(1), even up to at least 12 cached exception types.
       */

   * key/value mapping in the underlying multimap and determine which satisfy the filter. When a
   * live view is <i>not</i> needed, it may be faster to copy the filtered multimap and use the
   * copy.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> {@code keyPredicate} must be <i>consistent with equals</i>, as documented at

   * key/value mapping in the underlying multimap and determine which satisfy the filter. When a
   * live view is <i>not</i> needed, it may be faster to copy the filtered multimap and use the
   * copy.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> {@code keyPredicate} must be <i>consistent with equals</i>, as documented at

		}()
		time.Sleep(1 * time.Millisecond) // wait for goroutine to advance; ref=2

		// Unlock the 1st lock; ref=1 after this line
		nsLk.unlock("volume", "path", false)

		// Taking another lockMapMutex here allows queuing up additional lockers. This should
		// not be required but makes reproduction much easier.
		nsLk.lockMapMutex.Lock()

		// lk3 blocks.
		lk3ch := make(chan bool)
		go func() {

Still, in both situations, chances are that **FastAPI** will [still be faster](index.md#performance){.internal-link target=_blank} than (or at least comparable to) your previous framework.

### Dependencies { #dependencies }

With **FastAPI**, using OpenAPI, you can define the names of these webhooks, the types of HTTP operations that your app can send (e.g. `POST`, `PUT`, etc.) and the request **bodies** that your app would send.

This can make it a lot easier for your users to **implement their APIs** to receive your **webhook** requests, they might even be able to autogenerate some of their own API code.

/// info

import java.util.concurrent.Executor;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/** Implementations of {@code Futures.transform*}. */
@GwtCompatible
// Whenever both tests are cheap and functional, it's faster to use &, | instead of &&, ||
@SuppressWarnings("ShortCircuitBoolean")
abstract class AbstractTransformFuture<
        I extends @Nullable Object, O extends @Nullable Object, F, T extends @Nullable Object>

      /**
       * For whatever reason our BouncyCastle provider doesn't work with ECDSA keys. Just configure it
       * to use RSA-2048 instead.
       *
       * (We otherwise prefer ECDSA because it's faster.)
       */
      private val localhostHandshakeCertificatesWithRsa2048: HandshakeCertificates by lazy {
        val heldCertificate =
          HeldCertificate
            .Builder()

Indian/Mayotte Indian/Reunion Iran Israel Jamaica Japan Kwajalein Libya MET MST MST7MDT Mexico/BajaNorte Mexico/BajaSur Mexico/General NZ NZ-CHAT Navajo PRC PST8PDT Pacific/Apia Pacific/Auckland Pacific/Bougainville Pacific/Chatham Pacific/Chuuk Pacific/Easter Pacific/Efate Pacific/Enderbury Pacific/Fakaofo Pacific/Fiji Pacific/Funafuti Pacific/Galapagos Pacific/Gambier Pacific/Guadalcanal Pacific/Guam Pacific/Honolulu Pacific/Johnston Pacific/Kanton Pacific/Kiritimati Pacific/Kosrae Pacific/Kwajalein Pacific/Majuro...