* Static final fields are presumed to be fastest, based on our experience with
       * UnsignedBytesBenchmark. TODO(cpovirk): benchmark this
       */
      /*
       * A CopyOnWriteArraySet<WeakReference> is faster than a newSetFromMap of a MapMaker map with
       * weakKeys() and concurrencyLevel(1), even up to at least 12 cached exception types.
       */

   * key/value mapping in the underlying multimap and determine which satisfy the filter. When a
   * live view is <i>not</i> needed, it may be faster to copy the filtered multimap and use the
   * copy.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> {@code keyPredicate} must be <i>consistent with equals</i>, as documented at

   * key/value mapping in the underlying multimap and determine which satisfy the filter. When a
   * live view is <i>not</i> needed, it may be faster to copy the filtered multimap and use the
   * copy.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> {@code keyPredicate} must be <i>consistent with equals</i>, as documented at

		}()
		time.Sleep(1 * time.Millisecond) // wait for goroutine to advance; ref=2

		// Unlock the 1st lock; ref=1 after this line
		nsLk.unlock("volume", "path", false)

		// Taking another lockMapMutex here allows queuing up additional lockers. This should
		// not be required but makes reproduction much easier.
		nsLk.lockMapMutex.Lock()

		// lk3 blocks.
		lk3ch := make(chan bool)
		go func() {

import java.util.concurrent.Executor;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/** Implementations of {@code Futures.transform*}. */
@GwtCompatible
// Whenever both tests are cheap and functional, it's faster to use &, | instead of &&, ||
@SuppressWarnings("ShortCircuitBoolean")
abstract class AbstractTransformFuture<
        I extends @Nullable Object, O extends @Nullable Object, F, T extends @Nullable Object>

      int n, @Nullable Entry<K, V>[] entryArray, boolean throwIfDuplicateKeys) {
    checkPositionIndex(n, entryArray.length);
    if (n == 0) {
      @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // it has no entries so the type variables don't matter
      ImmutableMap<K, V> empty = (ImmutableMap<K, V>) EMPTY;
      return empty;
    }
    try {
      return fromEntryArrayCheckingBucketOverflow(n, entryArray, throwIfDuplicateKeys);

  }

  public void testNulls_interface() {
    tester.testNulls(AnInterface.class);
  }

  public void testNulls_abstractClass() {
    tester.testNulls(AnAbstractClass.class);
  }

  public void testNulls_enum() throws Exception {
    tester.testNulls(OneConstantEnum.class);
    tester.testNulls(NoConstantEnum.class);
    tester.testNulls(TimeUnit.class);
  }

Still, in both situations, chances are that **FastAPI** will [still be faster](index.md#performance){.internal-link target=_blank} than (or at least comparable to) your previous framework.

### Dependencies { #dependencies }

With **FastAPI**, using OpenAPI, you can define the names of these webhooks, the types of HTTP operations that your app can send (e.g. `POST`, `PUT`, etc.) and the request **bodies** that your app would send.

This can make it a lot easier for your users to **implement their APIs** to receive your **webhook** requests, they might even be able to autogenerate some of their own API code.

/// info

      /**
       * For whatever reason our BouncyCastle provider doesn't work with ECDSA keys. Just configure it
       * to use RSA-2048 instead.
       *
       * (We otherwise prefer ECDSA because it's faster.)
       */
      private val localhostHandshakeCertificatesWithRsa2048: HandshakeCertificates by lazy {
        val heldCertificate =
          HeldCertificate
            .Builder()