) : CallEvent()

  data class SecureConnectEnd(
    override val timestampNs: Long,
    override val call: Call,
    val handshake: Handshake?,
  ) : CallEvent() {
    override fun closes(event: CallEvent): Boolean = event is SecureConnectStart && call == event.call
  }

  data class ConnectionAcquired(
    override val timestampNs: Long,
    override val call: Call,
    val connection: Connection,

    override val timestampNs: Long,
    val route: Route,
    val call: Call,
  ) : ConnectionEvent()

  data class ConnectFailed(
    override val timestampNs: Long,
    val route: Route,
    val call: Call,
    val exception: IOException,
  ) : ConnectionEvent() {
    override fun closes(event: ConnectionEvent): Boolean = event is ConnectStart && call == event.call && route == event.route
  }

  data class ConnectEnd(

        body = "/a has moved!",
      ),
    )
    server.enqueue(
      MockResponse(body = "/b is here"),
    )
    val request = Request(server.url("/"))
    val call = client.newCall(request)
    call.execute().use { response ->
      assertThat(
        response.body.string(),
      ).isEqualTo("unrelated response body!")
    }
    assertThat(server.takeRequest().exchangeIndex).isEqualTo(0)

        assertSame(mockFileEntry2, retrievedEntries[1]);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test nextElement method")
    void testNextElement() {
        // First call returns self
        SmbComTransactionResponse result = response.nextElement();
        assertSame(response, result);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test hasMoreElements method")

```Python
user_in = UserIn(username="john", password="secret", email="******@****.***")
```

and then we call:

```Python
user_dict = user_in.dict()
```

we now have a `dict` with the data in the variable `user_dict` (it's a `dict` instead of a Pydantic model object).

And if we call:

```Python
print(user_dict)
```

we would get a Python `dict` with:

```Python
{

   * words, the new supplier's value will be computed by retrieving the value from {@code supplier},
   * and then applying {@code function} to that value. Note that the resulting supplier will not
   * call {@code supplier} or invoke {@code function} until it is called.
   */
  public static <F extends @Nullable Object, T extends @Nullable Object> Supplier<T> compose(
      Function<? super F, T> function, Supplier<F> supplier) {

In diesem Fall übergeben wir eine Abhängigkeitsfunktion `get_current_active_user` an `Security` (genauso wie wir es mit `Depends` tun würden).

Wir übergeben aber auch eine `list`e von Scopes, in diesem Fall mit nur einem Scope: `items` (es könnten mehrere sein).

  }

  @Override public void callStart(Call call) {
    printEvent("callStart");
  }

  @Override public void callEnd(Call call) {
    printEvent("callEnd");
  }

  @Override public void dnsStart(Call call, String domainName) {
    printEvent("dnsStart");
  }

  @Override public void dnsEnd(Call call, String domainName, List<InetAddress> inetAddressList) {
    printEvent("dnsEnd");

    }

    @Override public void callStart(Call call) {
      printEvent("callStart");
    }

    @Override public void proxySelectStart(Call call, HttpUrl url) {
      printEvent("proxySelectStart");
    }

    @Override public void proxySelectEnd(Call call, HttpUrl url, List<Proxy> proxies) {
      printEvent("proxySelectEnd");
    }

    @Override public void dnsStart(Call call, String domainName) {

            int expectedSize = request.size();

            // Call size multiple times
            for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
                assertEquals(expectedSize, request.size());
            }

            assertEquals(1001, request.getSizeCallCount()); // Including initial call
        }
    }