this.relationshipName = checkNotNull(relationshipName);
    this.hashName = checkNotNull(hashName);
    this.itemReporter = checkNotNull(itemReporter);
  }

  // TODO(cpovirk): should we reject null items, since the tests already check null automatically?
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public RelationshipTester<T> addRelatedGroup(Iterable<? extends T> group) {
    groups.add(ImmutableList.copyOf(group));
    return this;

     * Maybe flag - indicates 'maybe' call semantics requested
     */
    int DCERPC_MAYBE = 0x40; /* `maybe' call semantics requested */
    /**
     * Object UUID flag - if true, a non-nil object UUID is present
     */
    int DCERPC_OBJECT_UUID = 0x80; /* if true, a non-nil object UUID */

    // Packet Types (ptype)
    /**
     * Request packet type
     */
    int RPC_PT_REQUEST = 0x00;
    /**
     * Ping packet type

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should reject null data buffer in sign method")
        void testSignNullDataBuffer() {
            assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> digest.sign(null, 0, 100, request, response),
                    "Should throw IllegalArgumentException for null data buffer");
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should reject negative offset in sign method")

// record is formatted as:
//
//	"%d %s=%s\n" % (size, key, value)
//
// Keys and values should be UTF-8, but the number of bad writers out there
// forces us to be a more liberal.
// Thus, we only reject all keys with NUL, and only reject NULs in values
// for the PAX version of the USTAR string fields.
// The key must not contain an '=' character.
func validPAXRecord(k, v string) bool {
	if k == "" || strings.Contains(k, "=") {

            assertEquals(expectedServer, binding.getServer());
            assertEquals(expectedEndpoint, binding.getEndpoint());
        }

        @ParameterizedTest
        @DisplayName("Should reject invalid binding URLs")
        @ValueSource(strings = { "invalid_url", "proto:", "proto:server[]", "proto:[key=]", "proto:[=value]", "proto:server[endpoint=]",
                "proto:[endpoint=]" })

        assertFalse(itr.hasNext());
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Filter rejects first, accepts second; interactions verified")
    void filterRejectsThenAccepts_nextYieldsAccepted() throws Exception {
        // Arrange: two entries; filter rejects first, accepts second
        setupParentForUrlCreation();
        StubFileEntry skip = new StubFileEntry("SKIPME", SmbConstants.TYPE_SERVER);

   - If you edit, you’re a collaborator, not a reviewer, and cannot merge.

6. **Testing**:
   - Assume the submitter tested the code. If testing is unclear, ask for details (e.g., “How was this tested?”).
   - Reject untested PRs unless testing is infeasible, then assist with test setup.

## Tips for Success

- **Small PRs**: Easier to review, faster to merge. Split large changes logically.

    }
    return standardAddAll(collection);
  }

  @Override
  @J2ktIncompatible // Incompatible return type change. Use inherited implementation
  public Object[] toArray() {
    /*
     * If we could, we'd declare the no-arg `Collection.toArray()` to return "Object[] but elements
     * have the same nullness as E." Since we can't, we declare it to return nullable elements, and

acceptable behavior and will take appropriate and fair corrective action in
response to any behavior that they deem inappropriate, threatening, offensive,
or harmful.

Community leaders have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject
comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are
not aligned to this Code of Conduct, and will communicate reasons for moderation
decisions when appropriate.

## Scope

    this.relationshipName = checkNotNull(relationshipName);
    this.hashName = checkNotNull(hashName);
    this.itemReporter = checkNotNull(itemReporter);
  }

  // TODO(cpovirk): should we reject null items, since the tests already check null automatically?
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public RelationshipTester<T> addRelatedGroup(Iterable<? extends T> group) {
    groups.add(ImmutableList.copyOf(group));
    return this;