assertEquals("test", pom.getValue("build/defaultGoal"));
        assertEquals("coreit", pom.getValue("build/finalName"));

        assertPathSuffixEquals("build", pom.getValue("build/directory"));
        assertPathSuffixEquals("build/main", pom.getValue("build/outputDirectory"));
        assertPathSuffixEquals("build/test", pom.getValue("build/testOutputDirectory"));

        configuration.setResolveDependencies(true);

        // single project build entry point
        ProjectBuildingResult result = getContainer()
                .lookup(org.apache.maven.project.ProjectBuilder.class)
                .build(pomFile, configuration);
        assertEquals(1, result.getProject().getArtifacts().size());
        // multi projects build entry point
        List<ProjectBuildingResult> results = getContainer()

        // Should have both consumer POM (no classifier) and build POM (with "build" classifier)
        Collection<Artifact> artifacts = result.getArtifacts();
        assertEquals(3, artifacts.size()); // original jar + consumer pom + build pom

        assertTrue(artifacts.stream().anyMatch(a -> "pom".equals(a.getExtension()) && "".equals(a.getClassifier())));

type Expression interface {
	Build(builder Builder)
}

// NegationExpressionBuilder negation expression builder
type NegationExpressionBuilder interface {
	NegationBuild(builder Builder)
}

// Expr raw expression
type Expr struct {
	SQL                string
	Vars               []interface{}
	WithoutParentheses bool
}

// Build build raw expression
func (expr Expr) Build(builder Builder) {

  }

  @Test
  fun proxy() {
    server.enqueue(MockResponse.Builder().body("abc").build())
    server.enqueue(MockResponse.Builder().body("def").build())
    val client =
      clientTestRule
        .newClientBuilder()
        .proxy(socksProxy.proxy())
        .build()
    val request1 = Request.Builder().url(server.url("/")).build()
    val response1 = client.newCall(request1).execute()

* **Starlette**:
    * Will have the next best performance, after Uvicorn. In fact, Starlette uses Uvicorn to run. So, it probably can only get "slower" than Uvicorn by having to execute more code.
    * But it provides you the tools to build simple web applications, with routing based on paths, etc.
    * If you are comparing Starlette, compare it against Sanic, Flask, Django, etc. Web frameworks (or microframeworks).
* **FastAPI**:

import org.gradle.api.provider.Provider
import org.gradle.build.event.BuildEventsListenerRegistry
// Using star import to workaround https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KTIJ-24390
import org.gradle.kotlin.dsl.*
import org.gradle.kotlin.dsl.support.serviceOf

/**
 * In build-logic and main build, register a BuildService instance separately,
 * which collects necessary information for Build Scan.
 */

  <modelVersion>4.2.0</modelVersion>

  <properties>
    <project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding>
    <project.reporting.outputEncoding>UTF-8</project.reporting.outputEncoding>
    <!-- Fixed date for reproducible build -->
    <project.build.outputTimestamp>1980-02-01T00:00:00Z</project.build.outputTimestamp>
  </properties>

  <build>
    <directory>${project.basedir}/target</directory>

    }
  }

  @Test
  fun testLocalhostInsecure() {
    assumeTrue(Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= 24)

    val clientCertificates =
      HandshakeCertificates
        .Builder()
        .apply {
          if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= 24) {
            addInsecureHost(server.hostName)
          }
        }.build()

    client =
      client
        .newBuilder()

                    <version>1.0.0</version>
                    <build>
                        <plugins>
                            <plugin>
                                <artifactId>maven-shade-plugin</artifactId>
                                <version>3.1.0</version>
                            </plugin>
                        </plugins>
                    </build>
                </project>
                """;