// forward map ordered by currency (even for country values)
    assertThat(bimap.values()).containsExactly(Country.SWITZERLAND, Country.CHILE).inOrder();
    // backward map ordered by country
    assertThat(bimap.inverse().keySet())
        .containsExactly(Country.CHILE, Country.SWITZERLAND)
        .inOrder();
    // backward map ordered by country (even for currency values)

      } finally {
        monitor.leave();
      }
    } else {
      // It is possible due to races that we are currently in the expected state even though we
      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.

        assertFalse(config.isUseBatching(), "Batching should be disabled");

        // Even with batching disabled, getBatchLimit should return a value
        int limit = config.getBatchLimit("TreeConnectAndX.Transaction");
        assertTrue(limit >= 0, "Batch limit should still return a value even when batching is disabled");
    }

    /**
     * Test configuration when Unicode is disabled
     */
    @Test

 * future frames won't arrive on the stream ID.
 */
interface PushObserver {
  /**
   * Describes the request that the server intends to push a response for.
   *
   * @param streamId server-initiated stream ID: an even number.
   * @param requestHeaders minimally includes `:method`, `:scheme`, `:authority`,
   * and `:path`.
   */
  fun onRequest(
    streamId: Int,
    requestHeaders: List<Header>,
  ): Boolean

  /**

     * Even if empty string, treated as empty plainly. So "IF pmb != null" is false if empty.
     * @param hostname The parameter value of hostname. (NotNull)
     */
    public void setHostname(String hostname) {
        registerVariable("hostname", hostname);
    }

    /**
     * Set the value of clustername, used in parameter comment. <br>

      } finally {
        monitor.leave();
      }
    } else {
      // It is possible due to races that we are currently in the expected state even though we
      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.

 * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
 *
 * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
 * Lesser General Public License for more details.
 *
 * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public

 * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
 *
 * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
 * Lesser General Public License for more details.
 *
 * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public

            0.03,
            BloomFilterStrategies.MURMUR128_MITZ_32);

    // Insert "numInsertions" even numbers into the BF.
    for (int i = 0; i < numInsertions * 2; i += 2) {
      bf.put(Integer.toString(i));
    }
    assertApproximateElementCountGuess(bf, numInsertions);

    // Assert that the BF "might" have all of the even numbers.
    for (int i = 0; i < numInsertions * 2; i += 2) {

      putNext(this, next);
    }

    void unpark() {
      // This is racy with removeWaiter. The consequence of the race is that we may spuriously call
      // unpark even though the thread has already removed itself from the list. But even if we did
      // use a CAS, that race would still exist (it would just be ever so slightly smaller).
      Thread w = thread;
      if (w != null) {
        thread = null;