t.Fatalf("joins NamedPet and Account should not empty:%v", user1)
	}

	// Account should empty
	DB.Delete(&user1.Account)

	var user2 User
	DB.Model(&User{}).Joins("NamedPet").Joins("Account").First(&user2, user.ID)
	if user2.NamedPet == nil || user2.Account.ID != 0 {
		t.Fatalf("joins Account should not empty:%v", user2)
	}

	// NamedPet should empty
	DB.Delete(&user1.NamedPet)

		t.Errorf("Failed to migrate, got error: %v", err)
	}

	if DB.Migrator().HasColumn(&CustomizeFieldStruct{}, "FieldIgnore") {
		t.Errorf("FieldIgnore should not be created")
	}

	if DB.Migrator().HasColumn(&CustomizeFieldStruct{}, "field_ignore") {
		t.Errorf("FieldIgnore should not be created")
	}

	generateStruct := func(name string) *CustomizeFieldStruct {
		return &CustomizeFieldStruct{
			Name:             name,

	VPGATHERDQ X2, 664(X2*8), X7    // ERROR "mask, index, and destination registers should be distinct"
	VPGATHERDQ X2, 664(X7*8), X2    // ERROR "mask, index, and destination registers should be distinct"
	VPGATHERDQ X7, 664(X2*8), X2    // ERROR "mask, index, and destination registers should be distinct"
	// Non-X0 for Yxr0 should produce an error
	BLENDVPD X1, (BX), X2           // ERROR "invalid instruction"

        // Should alternate between channels
        ChannelInfo first = loadBalancer.selectChannel(mockMessage);
        ChannelInfo second = loadBalancer.selectChannel(mockMessage);

        assertNotNull(first);
        assertNotNull(second);
        // Due to round-robin, should get different channels or same order

        SMBProtocolDowngradeException ex = new SMBProtocolDowngradeException();

        // Assert - message and cause are null
        assertNull(ex.getMessage(), "Default constructor should have null message");
        assertNull(ex.getCause(), "Default constructor should have null cause");

        // Assert - toString shows class name when message is null
        assertEquals(SMBProtocolDowngradeException.class.getName(), ex.toString());

* There should be tests testing the source example.
* Before the PR is applied, the new tests should fail.
* After applying the PR, the new tests should pass.
* Coverage should stay at 100%.

    assertEquals("Cause should be available.", exception, handler.exception);
    assertEquals("EventBus should be available.", eventBus, handler.context.getEventBus());
    assertEquals("Event should be available.", EVENT, handler.context.getEvent());
    assertEquals("Subscriber should be available.", subscriber, handler.context.getSubscriber());
    assertEquals(
        "Method should be available.",

        byte[] first = impl.getBuffer(); // should return slot 0 -> a
        byte[] second = impl.getBuffer(); // then slot 1 -> c
        byte[] third = impl.getBuffer(); // cache empty -> new with size 3

        assertSame(a, first, "First get should return first cached buffer");
        assertSame(c, second, "Second get should return second cached buffer");
        assertNotSame(d, third, "Third get should allocate a new buffer (not the dropped one)");

        long decoded = Encdec.dec_uint64le(buffer, 0);

        // Then
        assertEquals(currentDate.getTime(), decoded, "Encoded and decoded time should match");
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should encode and decode UUIDs")
    void testUUIDOperations() {
        // Given

        assertNotNull(ResolverType.RESOLVER_WINS, "RESOLVER_WINS should not be null.");
        assertNotNull(ResolverType.RESOLVER_BCAST, "RESOLVER_BCAST should not be null.");
        assertNotNull(ResolverType.RESOLVER_DNS, "RESOLVER_DNS should not be null.");
        assertNotNull(ResolverType.RESOLVER_LMHOSTS, "RESOLVER_LMHOSTS should not be null.");
    }

    /**
     * Tests the total number of enum constants.