*/
public class BuildAbort extends Error {

    public BuildAbort(String message) {
        super(message);
    }

    public BuildAbort(String message, Throwable cause) {
        super(message, cause);
    }

      }
    }

    return null
  }

  private fun <E : IOException?> timeoutExit(cause: E): E {
    if (timeoutEarlyExit) return cause
    if (!timeout.exit()) return cause

    val e = InterruptedIOException("timeout")
    if (cause != null) e.initCause(cause)
    @Suppress("UNCHECKED_CAST") // E is either IOException or IOException?
    return e as E
  }

  /**

        } catch (Exception e) {
            Throwable cause = e.getCause();
            if (cause instanceof ModelBuildingException) {
                String message = "In: " + pom + "\n\n";
                for (ModelProblem problem : ((ModelBuildingException) cause).getProblems()) {
                    message += problem + "\n";
                }

                    t = causes[causes.length - 1];
                }
            }

            String errorName;
            final Throwable cause = t.getCause();
            if (cause != null) {
                errorName = cause.getClass().getCanonicalName();
            } else {
                errorName = t.getClass().getCanonicalName();
            }

   *
   * See [SocketPolicy] for reasons why this can cause test flakiness and how to avoid it.
   */
  object ShutdownInputAtEnd : SocketPolicy

  /**
   * Shutdown the socket output after sending the response. For testing bad behavior.
   *
   * See [SocketPolicy] for reasons why this can cause test flakiness and how to avoid it.
   */
  object ShutdownOutputAtEnd : SocketPolicy

        new AbstractFuture<Object>() {
          @Override
          public String pendingToString() {
            return "cause=[Because this test isn't done]";
          }
        };
    assertThat(testFuture.toString())
        .matches(
            "[^\\[]+\\[status=PENDING, info=\\[cause=\\[Because this test isn't done\\]\\]\\]");
    TimeoutException e = assertThrows(TimeoutException.class, () -> testFuture.get(1, NANOSECONDS));

		}
		return v.Msg, v.Err
	case <-ctx.Done():
		if debugReqs {
			return nil, fmt.Errorf("%d %s ERR: %w", m.MuxID, m.parent.String(), context.Cause(ctx))
		}
		return nil, context.Cause(ctx)
	}
}

// send the message. msg.Seq and msg.MuxID will be set
func (m *muxClient) send(msg message) error {
	m.respMu.Lock()
	defer m.respMu.Unlock()
	if m.closed {

    assertThat(future.set(1)).isTrue();
    assertSuccessful(future, 1);
  }

  public void testFailed() throws Exception {
    Exception cause = new Exception();
    assertThat(future.setException(cause)).isTrue();
    assertFailed(future, cause);
  }

  public void testCanceled() throws Exception {
    assertThat(future.cancel(false /* mayInterruptIfRunning */)).isTrue();
    assertCancelled(future, false);

the vast majority of deployments in any negative way.

> Will an upgrade of an existing MinIO cluster impact the SLA of the cluster or will it even cause downtime?

No, an upgrade should not cause any downtime. However, on the first startup -
since MinIO will attempt to migrate any existing IAM data - the boot process may
take slightly longer, but may not be visibly noticeable. Once the migration has

        .withSetUp(setUp)
        .withTearDown(tearDown)
        .createTestSuite();
  }

  private static LinkageError newLinkageError(Throwable cause) {
    LinkageError error = new LinkageError(cause.toString());
    error.initCause(cause);
    return error;
  }