Imaginez que vous êtes l'ordinateur / le programme 🤖 dans cette histoire.

Pendant que vous faites la queue, vous être simplement inactif 😴, attendant votre tour, ne faisant rien de "productif". Mais la queue est rapide car le serveur 💁 prend seulement les commandes (et ne les prépare pas), donc tout va bien.

### 依存関係の要件

これらはリクエストの要件（ヘッダのようなもの）やその他のサブ依存関係を宣言することができます:

```Python hl_lines="6 11"
{!../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial006.py!}
```

### 例外の発生

これらの依存関係は通常の依存関係と同じように、例外を`raise`発生させることができます:

```Python hl_lines="8 13"
{!../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial006.py!}
```

### 戻り値

そして、値を返すことも返さないこともできますが、値は使われません。

つまり、すでにどこかで使っている通常の依存関係（値を返すもの）を再利用することができ、値は使われなくても依存関係は実行されます:

// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.

// This is a sample chained plugin that supports multiple CNI versions. It
// parses prevResult according to the cniVersion
package plugin

import "errors"

// ErrNotImplemented is returned when a requested feature is not implemented.
var ErrNotImplemented = errors.New("not implemented")

👆 💪 ⚙️ 🎏 🔗 *🔢* 👆 ⚙️ 🛎.

### 🔗 📄

👫 💪 📣 📨 📄 (💖 🎚) ⚖️ 🎏 🎧-🔗:

```Python hl_lines="6  11"
{!../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial006.py!}
```

### 🤚 ⚠

👫 🔗 💪 `raise` ⚠, 🎏 😐 🔗:

```Python hl_lines="8  13"
{!../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial006.py!}
```

### 📨 💲

& 👫 💪 📨 💲 ⚖️ 🚫, 💲 🏆 🚫 ⚙️.

### Sempre levante (`raise`) exceções em Dependências com `yield` e `except`

Se você capturar uma exceção em uma dependência com `yield`, a menos que você esteja levantando outra `HTTPException` ou coisa parecida, você deveria relançar a exceção original.

Você pode relançar a mesma exceção utilizando `raise`:

//// tab | Python 3.9+

```Python hl_lines="17"

			t.Errorf("Test %d: %s: Expected to fail with error \"%v\", but instead failed with error \"%v\" instead.", i, instanceType, testCase.expectedError, actualErr)
			continue
		}
		// Test passes as expected, but the output values are verified for correctness here.
		if actualErr == nil {
			// Asserting whether the md5 output is correct.

 with its <<<DefaultArtifact>>> implementation ({{{./xref/org/apache/maven/artifact/DefaultArtifact.html}source}}).

 The jar file is executable and provides a little tool to display how Maven parses and compares versions:

+----+
$ java -jar maven-artifact-*.jar 3.2.4-alpha-1 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT 3.2.4.0
Display parameters as parsed by Maven (in canonical form) and comparison result:
1. 3.2.4-alpha-1 == 3.2.4.alpha.1

  }

  /** Test that giving a null 'safeChars' string causes a {@link NullPointerException}. */
  public void testBadArguments_null() {
    assertThrows(NullPointerException.class, () -> new PercentEscaper(null, false));
  }

  /**
   * Tests that specifying any alphanumeric characters as 'safe' causes an {@link
   * IllegalArgumentException}.
   */
  public void testBadArguments_badchars() {

   * @return an unmodifiable list containing the cause chain starting with {@code throwable}
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if there is a loop in the causal chain
   */
  public static List<Throwable> getCausalChain(Throwable throwable) {
    checkNotNull(throwable);
    List<Throwable> causes = new ArrayList<>(4);
    causes.add(throwable);

    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us