// timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.
      throw new TimeoutException("Timed out waiting for " + this + " to reach the RUNNING state.");
    }
  }

  @Override
  public final void awaitTerminated() {

        if (!resource.getMessageList().isEmpty()) {
            return resource.getMessageList().stream().collect(Collectors.joining(" "));
        }

        if (cause == null) {
            return "Unknown error";
        }

        final Supplier<String> stacktraceString = () -> {
            final StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
            if (StringUtil.isBlank(cause.getMessage())) {

         * the way 2.x works. When we're in strict mode, the removal of duplicates just saves other merging steps from
         * aftereffects and bogus error messages.
         */
        List<Dependency> dependencies = model.getDependencies();
        Map<String, Dependency> normalized = new LinkedHashMap<>(dependencies.size() * 2);

     * value without re-executing the supplier.
     * <p>
     * The caching behavior is determined by the cache retention specified in the request's metadata.
     * If an error occurs during execution, it will be cached and re-thrown for subsequent identical requests.
     *
     * @param <REQ> The request type
     * @param <REP> The response type

            }
        }
    }

    /**
     * Closes the underlying CrawlerClient and releases any resources associated with it.
     *
     * @throws Exception if an error occurs during the close operation
     */
    @Override
    public void close() throws Exception {
        client.close();
    }

    /**
     * Returns the underlying CrawlerClient.

    "chunked".equals(header("Transfer-Encoding"), ignoreCase = true)
  ) {
    return true
  }

  return false
}

@Deprecated(
  message = "No longer supported",
  level = DeprecationLevel.ERROR,
  replaceWith = ReplaceWith(expression = "response.promisesBody()"),
)

{* ../../docs_src/security/tutorial007_an_py39.py hl[1,12:24] *}

这类似于：

```Python
if not (credentials.username == "stanleyjobson") or not (credentials.password == "swordfish"):
    # Return some error
    ...
```

但使用 `secrets.compare_digest()`，可以防御**时差攻击**，更加安全。

### 时差攻击

什么是**时差攻击**？

假设攻击者试图猜出用户名与密码。

他们发送用户名为 `johndoe`，密码为 `love123`  的请求。

然后，Python 代码执行如下操作：

```Python

### Errores Pequeños Manejados Automáticamente { #small-errors-automatically-handled }

Al construir APIs web con FastAPI, si hay un error en nuestro código, FastAPI normalmente lo contiene al request único que desencadenó el error. 🛡

El cliente obtendrá un **500 Internal Server Error** para ese request, pero la aplicación continuará funcionando para los siguientes requests en lugar de simplemente colapsar por completo.

Si no ve un header `Authorization`, o el valor no tiene un token `Bearer `, responderá directamente con un error de código de estado 401 (`UNAUTHORIZED`).

Ni siquiera tienes que verificar si el token existe para devolver un error. Puedes estar seguro de que si tu función se ejecuta, tendrá un `str` en ese token.

Puedes probarlo ya en los docs interactivos:

                CopyUtil.copy(in, out);
            } catch (final ClientAbortException e) {
                logger.debug("Client aborts this request.", e);
            } catch (final IOException e) {
                logger.error("Failed to read file: path={}, filePath={}", path, filePath);
                throw new WebApiException(HttpServletResponse.SC_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR, e);
            }
        } else {
            try {