&& Objects.equals(getValue(), other.getValue());
      }
      return false;
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
      return Objects.hash(getRowKey(), getColumnKey(), getValue());
    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
      return "(" + getRowKey() + "," + getColumnKey() + ")=" + getValue();
    }
  }

  /**

* Et le fichier `app/internal/admin.py` est un autre sous-module : `app.internal.admin`.

<img src="/img/tutorial/bigger-applications/package.drawio.svg">

La même structure de fichiers avec des commentaires :

```bash
.
├── app                  # "app" est un package Python
│   ├── __init__.py      # ce fichier fait de "app" un "package Python"
│   ├── main.py          # module "main", ex. import app.main

* Y el archivo `app/internal/admin.py` es otro submódulo: `app.internal.admin`.

<img src="/img/tutorial/bigger-applications/package.drawio.svg">

La misma estructura de archivos con comentarios:

```bash
.
├── app                  # "app" es un paquete de Python
│   ├── __init__.py      # este archivo hace que "app" sea un "paquete de Python"
│   ├── main.py          # módulo "main", por ejemplo import app.main

* E o arquivo `app/internal/admin.py` é outro submódulo: `app.internal.admin`.

<img src="/img/tutorial/bigger-applications/package.drawio.svg">

A mesma estrutura de arquivos com comentários:

```bash
.
├── app                  # "app" é um pacote Python
│   ├── __init__.py      # este arquivo torna "app" um "pacote Python"
│   ├── main.py          # módulo "main", p.ex., import app.main

         * @return the crawling depth
         */
        public int getDepth() {
            return depth;
        }

        @Override
        public int hashCode() {
            return Objects.hash(url);
        }

        @Override
        public boolean equals(final Object obj) {
            if (this == obj) {
                return true;
            }

        return name.equals(that.name) && parameterTypes.equals(that.parameterTypes);
      }
      return false;
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
      return Objects.hash(name, parameterTypes);
    }
  }

  /**
   * Verifies that {@code invokable} produces a {@link NullPointerException} or {@link

              <annotation>com.google.common.collect.testing.testers.IgnoreJRERequirement</annotation>
              <annotation>com.google.common.hash.IgnoreJRERequirement</annotation>
              <annotation>com.google.common.io.IgnoreJRERequirement</annotation>
              <annotation>com.google.common.math.IgnoreJRERequirement</annotation>

#!/usr/bin/env bash

TESTS_RUN_STATUS=1

function cleanup() {
	echo "Cleaning up MinIO deployment"
	docker compose -f "${DOCKER_COMPOSE_FILE}" down --volumes
	for container in $(docker ps -q); do
		echo Removing docker $container
		docker rm -f $container >/dev/null 2>&1
		docker wait $container
	done
}

function cleanup_and_prune() {
	cleanup
	docker system prune --volumes --force
	docker image prune --all --force
}

   *
   * <p>This implementation tries to be smart in a number of ways. It recognizes cases where the
   * negation is cheaper to precompute than the matcher itself; it tries to build small hash tables
   * for matchers that only match a few characters, and so on. In the worst-case scenario, it
   * constructs an eight-kilobyte bit array and queries that. In many situations this produces a

    if (object instanceof Range) {
      Range<?> other = (Range<?>) object;
      return lowerBound.equals(other.lowerBound) && upperBound.equals(other.upperBound);
    }
    return false;
  }

  /** Returns a hash code for this range. */
  @Override
  public int hashCode() {
    return lowerBound.hashCode() * 31 + upperBound.hashCode();
  }

  /**