d, err := Open(dirPath)
	if err != nil {
		if osErrToFileErr(err) == errFileNotFound {
			return nil
		}
		return osErrToFileErr(err)
	}
	defer d.Close()

	maxEntries := 1000
	for {
		// Read up to max number of entries.
		fis, err := d.Readdir(maxEntries)
		if err != nil {
			if err == io.EOF {
				break
			}
			err = osErrToFileErr(err)
			if err == errFileNotFound {
				return nil
			}

	config, err := kube.DefaultRestConfig(kubeconfig, "")
	if err != nil {
		log.Errorf("Failed setting up kubernetes client with kubeconfig %s", kubeconfig)
		return nil, err
	}

	log.Debugf("istio-cni set up kubernetes client with kubeconfig %s", kubeconfig)

	// Create the client
	return kubernetes.NewForConfig(config)
}

// getK8sPodInfo returns information of a POD

      id-token: write
    steps:
      - name: Dump GitHub context
        env:
          GITHUB_CONTEXT: ${{ toJson(github) }}
        run: echo "$GITHUB_CONTEXT"
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - name: Set up Python
        uses: actions/setup-python@v5
        with:
          python-version: "3.10"
          # Issue ref: https://github.com/actions/setup-python/issues/436
          # cache: "pip"

   * a good policy, especially because, in order for the test to pass, the
   * parameter must be misleadingly annotated as @Nullable. I suspect that
   * we'll want to remove @Nullable, add an eager checkNotNull, and loosen up
   * testRemove_nullAllowed.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @Override
  public int remove(@CheckForNull Object element, int occurrences) {
    if (occurrences == 0) {
      return count(element);
    }

    - master
    - "*.x"
  pull_request:
    branches:
    - master
    - "*.x"

jobs:
  build:

    runs-on: ubuntu-latest

    steps:
    - uses: actions/checkout@v2
    - name: Set up JDK 21
      uses: actions/setup-java@v2
      with:
        java-version: '21'
        distribution: 'temurin'
    - uses: actions/cache@v1
      with:
        path: ~/.m2/repository

/**
 * What should be done with the incoming socket.
 *
 * Be careful when using values like [DisconnectAtEnd], [ShutdownInputAtEnd]
 * and [ShutdownOutputAtEnd] that close a socket after a response, and where there are
 * follow-up requests. The client is unblocked and free to continue as soon as it has received the
 * entire response body. If and when the client makes a subsequent request using a pooled socket the

This platform is agnostic to what exactly the purpose of the work is.
It might be creating an application, setting up development environments, orchestrating deployments, running simulations, etc.

This platform does not provide special support for a particular kind of automation. This is the responsibility of other platforms. 

It is made up of 3 architecture modules:

              : Double.NEGATIVE_INFINITY;
        case CEILING:
          return (roundArbitrarily == Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY)
              ? Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY
              : -Double.MAX_VALUE;
        case UP:
          return roundArbitrarily;
        case UNNECESSARY:
          throw new ArithmeticException(x + " cannot be represented precisely as a double");
      }
    }

   *
   * We get plan0 and plan1 from the route planner.
   * We get plan2 as a follow-up to plan1, typically retry the same IP but different TLS.
   * We get plan3 as a retry of plan0, which was canceled when it lost the race.
   *
   * This test confirms that we prefer to do the TLS follow-up (plan2) before the TCP retry (plan3).
   * It also confirms we enforce the 250 ms delay in each race.
   */
  @Test

  final boolean threadStarted;

  /** Constructs a new queue. */
  public FinalizableReferenceQueue() {
    // We could start the finalizer lazily, but I'd rather it blow up early.
    queue = new ReferenceQueue<>();
    frqRef = new PhantomReference<>(this, queue);
    boolean threadStarted = false;
    try {
      startFinalizer.invoke(null, FinalizableReference.class, queue, frqRef);