`images`キーが画像オブジェクトのリストを持つようになったことに注目してください。

///

## 深くネストされたモデル

深くネストされた任意のモデルを定義することができます:

{* ../../docs_src/body_nested_models/tutorial007.py hl[9,14,20,23,27] *}

/// info | 情報

`Offer`は`Item`のリストであり、オプションの`Image`のリストを持っていることに注目してください。

///

## 純粋なリストのボディ

期待するJSONボディのトップレベルの値がJSON`array`（Pythonの`list`）であれば、Pydanticモデルと同じように、関数のパラメータで型を宣言することができます:

```Python
images: List[Image]
```

## Changelog since v1.28.12

## Changes by Kind

### API Change

- Fixed a bug in the API server where empty collections of ValidatingAdmissionPolicies did not have an `items` field. ([#126159](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/126159), [@xyz-li](https://github.com/xyz-li)) [SIG API Machinery]

///

`response_model` nimmt denselben Typ entgegen, den Sie auch für ein Pydantic-Modellfeld deklarieren würden, also etwa ein Pydantic-Modell, aber es kann auch z. B. eine `list`e von Pydantic-Modellen sein, wie etwa `List[Item]`.

FastAPI wird dieses `response_model` nehmen, um die Daten zu dokumentieren, validieren, usw. und auch, um **die Ausgabedaten** entsprechend der Typdeklaration **zu konvertieren und filtern**.

/// tip | Tipp

		adminRouter.Methods(http.MethodPut).Path(adminVersion + "/site-replication/peer/iam-item").HandlerFunc(adminMiddleware(adminAPI.SRPeerReplicateIAMItem))
		adminRouter.Methods(http.MethodPut).Path(adminVersion + "/site-replication/peer/bucket-meta").HandlerFunc(adminMiddleware(adminAPI.SRPeerReplicateBucketItem))

      private var canRemove = false

      override fun hasNext(): Boolean {
        if (nextUrl != null) return true

        canRemove = false // Prevent delegate.remove() on the wrong item!
        while (delegate.hasNext()) {
          try {
            delegate.next().use { snapshot ->
              val metadata = snapshot.getSource(ENTRY_METADATA).buffer()

	listResp, err := madmClient.ListServiceAccounts(ctx, parentAK)
	if err != nil {
		c.Fatalf("unable to list svc accounts: %v", err)
	}
	var accessKeys []string
	for _, item := range listResp.Accounts {
		accessKeys = append(accessKeys, item.AccessKey)
	}
	if !set.CreateStringSet(accessKeys...).Contains(svcAK) {
		c.Fatalf("service account did not appear in listing!")
	}
}

    list.set(0, 4.0);
    assertThat(newArray).isEqualTo(new double[] {0.0, 1.0, 2.0});
    newArray[1] = 5.0;
    assertThat((double) list.get(1)).isEqualTo(1.0);
  }

  // This test stems from a real bug found by andrewk
  public void testAsList_subList_toArray_roundTrip() {
    double[] array = {0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0};
    List<Double> list = Doubles.asList(array);

    // Make sure it returned a copy
    list.set(0, 4L);
    assertThat(newArray).isEqualTo(new long[] {0L, 1L, 2L});
    newArray[1] = 5L;
    assertThat((long) list.get(1)).isEqualTo(1L);
  }

  // This test stems from a real bug found by andrewk
  public void testAsList_subList_toArray_roundTrip() {
    long[] array = {0L, 1L, 2L, 3L};
    List<Long> list = Longs.asList(array);

    assertThat(newArray).isEqualTo(new short[] {(short) 0, (short) 1, (short) 2});
    newArray[1] = (short) 5;
    assertThat((short) list.get(1)).isEqualTo((short) 1);
  }

  // This test stems from a real bug found by andrewk
  public void testAsList_subList_toArray_roundTrip() {
    short[] array = {(short) 0, (short) 1, (short) 2, (short) 3};
    List<Short> list = Shorts.asList(array);

/// tip | Dica

Não se preocupe se alguns desses itens sobre **contêineres**, Docker ou Kubernetes ainda não fizerem muito sentido.