!important;\n}\n\n.opacity-100 {\n  opacity: 1 !important;\n}\n\n.overflow-auto {\n  overflow: auto !important;\n}\n\n.overflow-hidden {\n  overflow: hidden !important;\n}\n\n.overflow-visible {\n  overflow: visible !important;\n}\n\n.overflow-scroll {\n  overflow: scroll !important;\n}\n\n.overflow-x-auto {\n  overflow-x: auto !important;\n}\n\n.overflow-x-hidden {\n  overflow-x: hidden !important;\n}\n\n.overflow-x-visible {\n  overflow-x: visible !important;\n}\n\n.overflow-x-scroll {\n  overflow-x:...

    do {
      val buffer = cursor.data
      var i = cursor.start
      val end = cursor.end
      if (buffer != null) {
        while (i < end) {
          keyIndex %= keyLength // Reassign to prevent overflow breaking counter.

          // Byte xor is experimental in Kotlin so we coerce bytes to int, xor them
          // and convert back to byte.
          val bufferInt: Int = buffer[i].toInt()

          // or we could avoid inputstreamreader and use the decoder api directly
          // TODO(lukes): in a real implementation we would need to handle overflow conditions
          int maxChars = (int) (size.get().intValue() * cs.newDecoder().maxCharsPerByte());
          char[] buffer = new char[maxChars];
          int bufIndex = 0;
          int remaining = buffer.length;

                throw new IllegalArgumentException("Destination index cannot be negative");
            }
            if (dstIndex + encodedSize > dst.length) {
                throw new ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException("Buffer overflow");
            }

            // Simulate encoding: write header (8 bytes)
            Arrays.fill(dst, dstIndex, dstIndex + 8, (byte) 0xFF);
            int offset = dstIndex + 8;

   * time, then a request arrived and was immediately granted? This RateLimiter would immediately
   * forget about that past underutilization. This may result in either underutilization or
   * overflow, depending on the real world consequences of not using the expected rate.
   *
   * Past underutilization could mean that excess resources are available. Then, the RateLimiter

      // as a long, without risk of overflow:
      long numerator = (long) index * (dataset.length - 1);
      // Since scale is a positive int, index is in [0, scale], and (dataset.length - 1) is a
      // non-negative int, we can do long-arithmetic on index * (dataset.length - 1) / scale to get
      // a rounded ratio and a remainder which can be expressed as ints, without risk of overflow:

func exponentialBackoffWait(r *rand.Rand, unit, maxSleep time.Duration) func(uint) time.Duration {
	if unit > time.Hour {
		// Protect against integer overflow
		panic("unit cannot exceed one hour")
	}
	return func(attempt uint) time.Duration {
		if attempt > 16 {
			// Protect against integer overflow
			attempt = 16
		}
		// sleep = random_between(unit, min(cap, base * 2 ** attempt))

            // Validate that security buffer doesn't exceed available data
            if (hdrStart + securityBufferOffset < hdrStart || // Check for integer overflow
                    hdrStart + securityBufferOffset + securityBufferLength < 0 || // Check for integer overflow
                    hdrStart + securityBufferOffset + securityBufferLength > buffer.length) {

      count += values.length();
      return this;
    }

    private void ensureRoomFor(int numberToAdd) {
      int newCount = count + numberToAdd; // TODO(kevinb): check overflow now?
      if (newCount > array.length) {
        array = Arrays.copyOf(array, expandedCapacity(array.length, newCount));
      }
    }

    // Unfortunately this is pasted from ImmutableCollection.Builder.

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~