* prefix, or when one array is a prefix of the other, treats the shorter array as the lesser. For
   * example, {@code [] < [1] < [1, 2] < [2] < [1 << 31]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(int[], int[])}.
   *

                .filter(rap -> !allAvailableProfiles.contains(rap))
                .collect(toSet());

        if (!notFoundRequiredProfiles.isEmpty()) {
            // Use SLF4J formatter for consistency with warnings reported by logger
            final String message = MessageFormatter.format(
                            "The requested profiles {} could not be activated or deactivated because they do not"

We don't really need to inherit from `HeroBase` because we are re-declaring all the fields. I'll leave it inheriting just for consistency, but this is not necessary. It's more a matter of personal taste. 🤷

The fields of `HeroUpdate` are:

* `name`
* `age`
* `secret_name`

   *
   * <p>In detail, this method asserts
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li><i>reflexivity</i>: {@code comparator.compare(t, t) = 0} for all {@code t} in {@code
   *       valuesInExpectedOrder}; and
   *   <li><i>consistency</i>: {@code comparator.compare(ti, tj) < 0} and {@code
   *       comparator.compare(tj, ti) > 0} for {@code i < j}, where {@code ti =
   *       valuesInExpectedOrder.get(i)} and {@code tj = valuesInExpectedOrder.get(j)}.

   *
   * <p>Unlike the other {@code EndpointPair}-accepting methods, this method does not throw if the
   * endpoints are unordered and the graph is directed; it simply returns {@code false}. This is for
   * consistency with the behavior of {@link Collection#contains(Object)} (which does not generally
   * throw if the object cannot be present in the collection), and the desire to have this method's

   *
   * <p>Unlike the other {@code EndpointPair}-accepting methods, this method does not throw if the
   * endpoints are unordered and the graph is directed; it simply returns {@code false}. This is for
   * consistency with the behavior of {@link Collection#contains(Object)} (which does not generally
   * throw if the object cannot be present in the collection), and the desire to have this method's

   * prefix, or when one array is a prefix of the other, treats the shorter array as the lesser. For
   * example, {@code [] < [1L] < [1L, 2L] < [2L] < [1L << 63]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(long[],
   * long[])}.
   *

      assertThrows(
          NullPointerException.class, () -> builder.addAll((Iterable<String>) iterableWithNulls));
    }
  }

  /**
   * Verify thread safety by using a collection whose size() may be inconsistent with the actual
   * number of elements and whose elements may change over time.
   *
   * <p>This test might fail in GWT because the GWT emulations might count on the input collection

// RQErrType reason for read quorum error.
type RQErrType int

const (
	// RQInsufficientOnlineDrives - not enough online drives.
	RQInsufficientOnlineDrives RQErrType = 1 << iota
	// RQInconsistentMeta - inconsistent metadata.
	RQInconsistentMeta
)

func (t RQErrType) String() string {
	switch t {
	case RQInsufficientOnlineDrives:
		return "InsufficientOnlineDrives"
	case RQInconsistentMeta:

    }

    /**
     * @return <code>true</code> if the Mojo is online, <code>false</code> otherwise.
     */
    // blech! this isn't even intelligible as a method name. provided for
    // consistency...
    public boolean isOnlineRequired() {
        return onlineRequired;
    }

    /**
     * @return <code>true</code> if the Mojo is online, <code>false</code> otherwise.
     */